Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35174655›Full record

ReviewThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2022

The ethical challenges of artificial intelligence-driven digital pathology.

Francis McKay, Bethany J Williams, Graham Prestwich, Daljeet Bansal, Nina Hallowell, Darren Treanor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deep learning algorithm on H&E whole slide images to characterizeComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francis McKayThe Ethox Centre and the Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3177-9446
Bethany J WilliamsDepartment of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Graham PrestwichPatient and Public Engagement Lead, Yorkshire and Humber Academic Health Science Network, Wakefield, UK.
Daljeet BansalDepartment of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Nina HallowellThe Ethox Centre and the Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Darren TreanorDepartment of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital pathology - the digitalisation of clinical histopathology services through the scanning and storage of pathology slides - has opened up new possibilities for health care in recent years, particularly in the opportunities it brings for artificial intelligence (AI)-driven research. Recognising, however, that there is little scholarly debate on the ethics of digital pathology when used for AI research, this paper summarises what it sees as four key ethical issues to consider when deploying AI infrastructures in pathology, namely, privacy, choice, equity, and trust. The themes are inspired from the authors' experience grappling with the challenge of deploying an ethical digital pathology infrastructure to support AI research as part of the National Pathology Imaging Cooperative (NPIC), a collaborative of universities, hospital trusts, and industry partners largely located across the North of England. Though focusing on the UK case, internationally, few pathology departments have gone fully digital, and so the themes developed here offer a heuristic for ethical reflection for other departments currently making a similar transition or planning to do so in the future. We conclude by promoting the need for robust public governance mechanisms in AI-driven digital pathology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareHumansartificial intelligenceautonomybiaschoicecommercialisationdigital pathologyequityethicsprivacytrust

Identifiers

PMID35174655
PMCPMC8977272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.