Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35174521›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of clinical psychology2022

Unrealistic pessimism and obsessive-compulsive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: Two longitudinal studies.

Lena Jelinek, Gloria Röhrig, Steffen Moritz, Anja S Göritz, Ulrich Voderholzer, Anja Riesel, Amir H Yassari, Franziska Miegel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lena JelinekDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5292-350X
Gloria RöhrigDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7666-6701
Steffen MoritzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-0143
Anja S GöritzOccupational and Consumer Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4638-0489
Ulrich VoderholzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Anja RieselDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1902-6644
Amir H YassariDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Franziska MiegelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2845-8665
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUnrealistic pessimism (UP) is an aspect of overestimation of threat (OET) that has been associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder/symptoms (OCD/OCS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, UP may have played an important role in the course of OCD. To investigate the relationship, we conducted two longitudinal studies assuming that higher UP predicts an increase in OCS.

methodIn Study 1, we investigated UP in the general population (N = 1,184) at the start of the pandemic asking about overall vulnerability to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and UP regarding infection and outcome of severe illness. Further, OCS status (OCS+/-) was assessed at the start of the pandemic and 3 months later. In Study 2, we investigated UP in individuals with OCD (N = 268) regarding the likelihood of getting infected, recovering, or dying from an infection with SARS-CoV-2 at the start of the pandemic and re-assessed OCS 3 months later.

resultsIn Study 1, UP was higher in the OCS+ compared to the OCS- group, and estimates of a higher overall vulnerability for an infection predicted a decrease in OCS over time. UP regarding severe illness predicted an increase in symptoms over time. In Study 2, UP was found for a recovery and death after an infection with SARS-CoV-2, but not for infection itself.

conclusionsExaggeration of one's personal vulnerability rather than OET per se seems pivotal in OCD, with UP being associated with OCD/OCS+ as well as a more negative course of symptomatology over the pandemic in a nonclinical sample. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Unrealistic optimism, a bias common in healthy individuals, is thought to be a coping mechanism promoting well-being in the face of danger or uncertainty. The current study extends findings that its inversion, unrealistic pessimism, may play an important role in obsessive-compulsive disorder and may also be involved in the development of the disorder. This study highlights the importance that prevention programs during a pandemic should include targeting unrealistic pessimism.

Indexed as

COVID-19Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderPessimismHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2cognitive biasesCOVID-19 pandemicOCDoverestimation of threatunrealistic optimism

Identifiers

PMID35174521
PMCPMC9111568
OpenAlexW4213378753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.