Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35174508›Full record

ArticleJournal of community psychology2022

Between wellness and fairness: The mediating role of autonomous human choice and social capital in OECD countries.

Salvatore Di Martino, Michael P Scarpa, Isaac Prilleltensky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. From public health to public good: Toward universal wellbeing.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salvatore Di MartinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2165-3209
Michael P ScarpaDepartment of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4150-1907
Isaac PrilleltenskyDepartment of Educational and Psychological Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1805-2354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical arguments and empirical evidence have been provided in the literature for the role of fairness in wellness. In this paper, we explore the role of two potential mediating variables: autonomous human choice and social capital. Using aggregated panel data across countries belonging to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), we compared the OECD Social Justice Index (SJI) with data on life satisfaction to test whether fairness has direct and indirect effects on wellness. Results from a series of Manifest Path Analyses with time as fixed effect, support the hypothesis that the OECD SJI is directly linked to country-level life satisfaction, additionally revealing that its indirect effect operates primarily through people's autonomous choices in life and their country's level of social capital. Our results contribute to two distinct bodies of knowledge. With respect to community psychology, the findings offer empirical evidence for the synergistic effect of personal, relational, and collective factors in well-being. With respect to the impact of economic inequality on wellness, we extend the literature by using social justice as a more comprehensive measure. Limitations and recommendations for future studies are discussed.

Indexed as

Social CapitalHumansOrganisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentSocial Justiceautonomous human choiceGDPhappinesslife satisfactionManifest Path Analysissocial capitalsocial justice

Identifiers

PMID35174508
PMCPMC9544613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.