Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35174447›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery: Improving Patient Care through Synoptic Operative Reporting.

Tina J Hieken, William R Burns, Amanda B Francescatti, Arden M Morris, Sandra L Wong, Cancer Surgery Standards Program of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A standardized surgical approach to multifocal locoregionally recurrent left-sided adrenocortical carcinoma.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2025
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Defining and Achieving High-Quality Colon Cancer Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Understanding How Surgeons Improve the Quality of Breast Cancer Surgery Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Operative Standards for Cancer Surgery: Will Synoptic Reporting Really Improve Cancer Outcomes?Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tina J HiekenDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA. hieken.tina@mayo.edu.
William R BurnsDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amanda B FrancescattiAmerican College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA.
Arden M MorrisDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sandra L WongDepartment of Surgery, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Cancer Surgery Standards Program of the American College of Surgeons

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Operative Standards for Cancer Surgery manuals define critical elements of optimal cancer surgery based on data and expert opinion. These key aspects of commonly performed cancer operations define technical standards that can be used as a quality assurance tool for practicing surgical oncologists and as an educational tool for trainees. This article provides background on these operative standards and their subsequent integration into synoptic operative report templates. With the goal of codifying the most important aspects of surgical oncology care to elevate and harmonize cancer care, the American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs has developed comprehensive synoptic operative reports. Synoptic operative reports are structured so that key data elements are recorded in a standardized format with prespecified terminology. In contrast to the narrative or structured operative reports frequently used by surgeons, these synoptic operative reports improve semantic clarity, provide uniform fields for abstraction, and facilitate passive data collection and real-time analytics while delivering key information for downstream multidisciplinary patient care. In this way, the synoptic operative report is a key component of a comprehensive effort to elevate the quality of cancer care nationally.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSurgeonsData CollectionHumansPatient CareElectronic medical recordOncologyQuality improvementStandardsSurgerySynoptic operative report

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.