ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Validation of the distal filling ratio in uncemented convertible short-stem shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a short-stem humeral component: a ten-year follow-up study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Radiographic bone resorption after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a single onlay platform: risk factors and distribution patterns in a Japanese cohort.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Clinical relevance, classification, and risk factors for stress shielding in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Volumetric Humeral Canal Fill Ratio Effects Primary Stability and Cortical Bone Loading in Short and Standard Stem Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical and Computational Study.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Accuracy and Reliability of Computerized Surgical Planning Software in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRadiographic stress shielding is a common finding in uncemented convertible short-stem shoulder arthroplasty (UCSSSA). The distal filling ratio (DFR) has been described as a predictor for the occurrence of stress shielding. A DFR > 70% was mentioned as a risk factor for the occurrence of stress shielding for some UCSSSA. However, measurements were only performed on conventional radiographs and no validation exists for 3D automated planning tools.
methodsDFR was manually measured on postoperative true ap radiographs of 76 shoulder arthroplasties using a standardized protocol and were compared to preoperative CT scans with an automated calculation of the DFR after virtual implantation of the stem.
resultsThe mean DFR measured on X-rays was 75.9% (SD = 8.7; 95% CI = 74-78) vs. 78.9% (SD = 9.1; 95% CI = 76.8-83) automatically measured on CT scans. This difference was significant (p < 0.001). In 7 out of 76 cases (9%) the difference between manual measurement on radiographs and computerized measurement on CT scans was > 10%.
conclusionManual measurement of the DFR is underestimated on conventional radiographs compared to automated calculation on CT scans be a mean of 3%. Therefore, automated measurement of the DFR on CT scans seems to be beneficial, especially in cases with osteopenic cortices. Manual measurement of the DFR on conventional ap radiographs in cases without CT scans, however, is still a viable alternative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35174410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.