Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35174398›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2022

[Contemporary surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction in Germany : A population-wide study based on German hospital quality report data from 2006 to 2019].

Annemarie Uhlig, Martin Baunacke, Christer Groeben, Angelika Borkowetz, Björn Volkmer, Sascha A Ahyai, Lutz Trojan, Nicole Eisenmenger, Andreas Schneider, Christian Thomas and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Annemarie UhligKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. annemarie.uhlig@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Martin BaunackeKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Christer GroebenKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
Angelika BorkowetzKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Björn VolkmerKlinik für Urologie, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland.
Sascha A AhyaiUniversitätsklinik für Urologie, LKH-Univ. Klinikum Graz, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Österreich.
Lutz TrojanKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Nicole EisenmengerReimbursement Institute, Hürth, Deutschland.
Andreas SchneiderGemeinschaftspraxis für Urologie, Buchholz, Deutschland.
Christian ThomasKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
Johannes HuberKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
Marianne LeitsmannKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has greatly evolved in recent years.

objectivesThe aim of this study is to present contemporary management and trends for surgical BPO therapy in Germany. MATERIALS AND

methodsDisease and procedure rates were extracted using the online platform reimbursement.INFO that is based on German hospital quality report data. For the diagnosis of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), the ICD codes N40 and D29.1 were used. For evaluation of the surgical procedures OPS codes 5‑600.0, 5‑601, 5‑603, 5‑609.4 and 5‑609.8 including their subcodes were used. In addition to descriptive analyses, trend and correlation analyses were performed.

resultsIn 2019, a total of 83,687 procedures for BPO in 473 urological departments were performed. The most common (71.7%) surgery was transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P). Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP; 9.5%) and surgical adenomectomy (5.6%) were the second and third most common procedures. Less often thulium laser enucleation (ThuLEP; 3.1%), laser vaporisation (2.9%) and electrical vaporisation (2.8%) were performed. All other techniques were performed in < 1%. Rates of HoLEP, ThuLEP and electrovaporisation have increased since 2006 (HoLEP: +42.42%/year, p < 0.001; ThuLEP: +20.6%/year, p = 0.99; electrovaporisation +43.42%/year, p < 0.001), while surgical adenomectomy decreased (-1.66%/year, p < 0.01). In 2019 mean length of hospital stay was 5.1 ± 0.1 days.

conclusionsTUR‑P remains the most often performed surgical treatment for BPO. Laser therapy-especially in centers-is increasing, while surgical adenomectomy continues to abate.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyProstatic HyperplasiaTransurethral Resection of ProstateHospitalsHumansMaleThuliumTreatment OutcomeThuliumBenign prostatic hyperplasiaBenign prostatic obstructionEnucleation for prostate adenomaTherapeutic optionsTransurethral resection of the prostate

Identifiers

PMID35174398
PMCPMC9072522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.