Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35174362›Full record

ArticleDiscover mental health2022

Men are the main COVID-19 transmitters: behavior or biology?

Monize V R Silva, Mateus V de Castro, Maria Rita Passos-Bueno, Paulo A Otto, Michel S Naslavsky, Mayana Zatz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The conneXion between sex and immune responses.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2024
    Review
  3. Migrant Men Living in Brazil during the Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Immunological evaluation of young unvaccinated patients with Turner syndrome after COVID-19.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monize V R Silva *Human Genome and Stem Cell Research Center (HUG-CELL), Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP Brazil.
Mateus V de Castro *Human Genome and Stem Cell Research Center (HUG-CELL), Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP Brazil.
Maria Rita Passos-BuenoHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center (HUG-CELL), Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP Brazil.
Paulo A OttoDepartment of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP Brazil.
Michel S NaslavskyDepartment of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP Brazil.
Mayana ZatzHuman Genome and Stem Cell Research Center (HUG-CELL), Biosciences Institute, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has affected millions of people worldwide. Clinical manifestations range from severe cases with lethal outcome to mild or asymptomatic cases. Although the proportion of infected individuals does not differ between sexes, men are more susceptible to severe COVID-19, with a higher risk of death than women. Also, men are pointed out as more lax regarding protective measures, mask wearing and vaccination. Thus, we questioned whether sex-bias may be explained by biological pathways and/or behavioral aspects or both.

methodsBetween July 2020 and July 2021, we performed an epidemiological survey including 1744 unvaccinated adult Brazilian couples, with there was at least one infected symptomatic member, who were living together during the COVID-19 infection without protective measures. Presence or absence of infection was confirmed by RT-PCR and/or serology results. Couples were divided into two groups: (1) both partners were infected (concordant couples) and (2) one partner was infected and the spouse remained asymptomatic despite the close contact with the COVID-19 symptomatic partner (discordant couples). Statistical analysis of the collected data was performed aiming to verify a differential transmission potential between genders in couples keeping contact without protective measures.

resultsThe combination of our collected data showed that the man is the first (or the only) affected member in most cases when compared to women and that this difference may be explained by biological and behavioral factors.

conclusionsThe present study confirmed the existence of gender differences not only for susceptibility to infection and resistance to COVID-19 but also in its transmission rate.

Indexed as

Adult couplesBehaviorCOVID-19Household transmissionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35174362
PMCPMC8785017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.