Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35174129›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Realizing Promising Educational Practices in Academic Public Health: A Model for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.

Leah C Neubauer, Cheryl Merzel, Elizabeth M Weist, Jaime Antoinette Corvin, Allan Forsman, Jacquie Fraser, Heather L Henderson, Leslie J Hinyard, Karin Joann Opacich, Miryha G Runnerstrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leah C NeubauerFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Cheryl MerzelSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Elizabeth M WeistAssociation of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH), Washington, DC, United States.
Jaime Antoinette CorvinCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Allan ForsmanCollege of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States.
Jacquie FraserPrograms in Public Health, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Heather L HendersonSchool of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Leslie J HinyardSchool of Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Karin Joann OpacichSchool of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Miryha G RunnerstromProgram in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework and critical considerations for the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) in academic public health. Academic education for public health has undergone significant transformation over the last two decades as the demand for responsive and innovative public health pedagogy and training for preparing graduates to deploy an increasing array of skills has grown. The authors suggest that the role of schools, administrators, faculty, and educational staff in developing promising practices for teaching and learning in public health involves an articulated conceptual framework to guide the development and dissemination of scholarly, pedagogical innovations. Building on seminal philosophical foundations of SoTL, the authors conceptualize SoTL from the foundational belief that knowing and learning are communal tasks and that faculty are both scholars and learners in the practice of education. The paper advocates for SoTL as a form of engaged practice and scholarly inquiry that exists in contextually rich, diverse educational environments that abounds with uncertainty. SoTL is guided by an educational philosophy, values, and learning theories that envision educators critically examining themselves, their teaching practice, scholarly literature, and students' learning to improve their teaching, enhance learning, and promote further inquiry. The authors suggest that SoTL involves the search for multiple forms of evidence and fosters dialogues on multiple interpretations and perspectives of the most promising practices of teaching and learning. The authors advocate for the term promising practices as an outcome of SoTL that supports and nurtures ongoing scientific discovery and knowledge generation, instead of supporting the search for best-ness in teaching and learning endeavors. SoTL should occur across formal, informal, and nonformal education.

Indexed as

Fellowships and ScholarshipsEducational StatusHumansLearningPublic Healthacademic public healthfacultypedagogySoTL conceptual frameworksubstantive topicsteaching and learning

Identifiers

PMID35174129
PMCPMC8841580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.