ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2022
Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and periapical healing after root canal treatment using three different base endodontic sealers - A randomized control clinical trial.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Incidence of Postoperative Pain After Using Different Types of Sealers (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
Comparison of the Effects of Bio Ceramic and Epoxy Resin-based Sealers on Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial at Primary Health Care Corporation, Qatar.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Periapical Healing following Root Canal Treatment Using Different Endodontic Sealers: A Systematic Review.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of calcium silicate and epoxy resin-based sealers on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- The effect of different obturation techniques on post-obturation pain and sealer extrusion in single-visit root canal treatment: a prospective clinical randomized study.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Effect of an Experimental Resin-based Sealer (Resil) and AH-26 on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Iranian endodontic journal · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of the physicochemical properties and adhesive interface quality of BioRoot Flow and BioRoot RCS endodontic sealers: An in vitro study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Bioceramic Cements Versus Conventional Cements in the Prognosis of Endodontic Treatments in Patients with Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Iranian endodontic journal · 2026Review
- Assessment of postoperative pain after the use of calcium silicate bioceramic sealer - BioRoot RCS: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory action of AH-Plus sealer with and without petasin, pachymic acid, curcumin & shilajit: an invitro-study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and healing following root canal obturation with calcium silicate and bioactive glass-based sealers to epoxy resin-based sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of three accidentally extruded sealers in periapical healing - An evidence - based study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Post-operative pain after root canal filling with two different obturation techniques: A prospective study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and periapical healing after root canal treatment using three different endodontic sealers: A randomized controlled clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo animal studies andJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Review
- The status of clinical trials regarding root canal sealers.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2024Article
- Comparative antimicrobial activity of four different endodontic sealers.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023Article
- A Systematic Review on Comparison of Periapical Healing and Post-Operative Pain between Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin Based Sealers.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the postoperative pain and periapical healing after root canal treatment using three different base endodontic sealers. MATERIAL AND
methodsPrimary root canal treatment was initiated in 63 patients diagnosed with necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis, cleaning and shaping was completed in two visit and different base endodontic sealers were used for obturation were selected based on the random allocation of the participants to the following groups; Tubli-Seal, AH Plus and BioRoot RCS. Postoperative pain was recorded by using 100 mm visual analog scale at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 7 d after obturation. Digital periapical radiographic evaluation was done to assess rate of periapical healing at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months. Statistical analysis was done using Kruskal Wallis test and one-way ANOVA.
resultsThe mean difference in the size of periapical lesions for Tubli-Seal (6.27, 13.41), AH Plus (3.86, 9.80) and BioRoot RCS (4.05, 10.22) at 3 months and 6 months respectively. The mean pain scores at 24 h for Tubli-Seal (17.94 ± 11.35), AH Plus (11.57 ± 11.18), BioRoot RCS (4.73 ± 7.72). At 48 h, Tubli-Seal (5.26 ± 9.04), AH Plus (1.57 ± 3.74) and BioRoot RCS (1.57 ± 3.74) respectively. The mean pain score at 72 h for Tubli-Seal was 2.63 ± 7.33 whereas none of the patients had reported pain in AH Plus and BioRoot RCS group. None of the patients had pain after 7 d of treatment.
conclusionsBioRoot RCS showed less postoperative pain compared to AH Plus and Tubli-Seal and showed better periapical healing compared to AH Plus and Tubli-Seal at 3 and 6 months intervals respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.