Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173882›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022

Application of obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators in continuous quality improvement.

Liu Luo, Longqiong Wang, Min Zhang, Bizhen Liao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liu LuoThe First Clinical College of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing City, China.
Longqiong WangDepartment of Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing City, China.
Min ZhangThe First Clinical College of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing City, China.
Bizhen LiaoDepartment of Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing City, China.
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo verify the effect of obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators for continuously improving nursing quality.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the obstetric nurse quality in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from October 2019 to September 2020. Nurses and patients in the Obstetrics Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were respectively assigned into an experimental group and a control group. High-quality nursing services were provided to patients in both groups. In addition to the high-quality nursing services, the obstetric nurses in the experimental group received training on obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators based on the knowledge-attitude-practice model. An obstetric nursing quality evaluation was conducted between the two groups. Continuous quality improvement was achieved using the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle. The nursing quality was reflected by 14 obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators and the nurses' job satisfaction was compared between the experimental group and the control group before and after intervention.

resultsThe information regarding the nurses and parturients, and the nurses' job satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05). Except for information regarding the lateral perineotomy at vaginal delivery, there was no significant difference in other obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators between the two groups before the intervention. In the experimental group, the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction after intervention were better than before (P<0.05). In the experimental group, the rates of neonatal asphyxia/severe neonatal asphyxia and postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery after intervention was significantly lower than before (P<0.05). The experimental group had better outcomes than the control group in the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction (P<0.05).

conclusionObstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators can be used to improve the nursing quality in continuous quality improvement, which is worthy of promotion in clinics.

Indexed as

continuous quality improvementnursing qualitynursing-sensitive quality indicatorsObstetrics

Identifiers

PMID35173882
PMCPMC8829623
OpenAlexW4213392047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.