ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Effect of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis on recurrence, menstruation and pregnancy outcomes in patients with different degrees of intrauterine adhesions.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of magnetic thermal vibration therapy combined with Femoston on endometrial repair in postoperative patients with moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Trial
- Platelet-rich plasma as an adjuvant therapy for intrauterine adhesions: a narrative review of mechanisms, clinical efficacy and combination strategies.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Retrospective study on constructing a nomogram model based on clinical data to predict the recurrence probability of patients with intrauterine adhesions after separation surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic Factors and Predictive Models for Reproductive Outcomes in Patients with Intrauterine Adhesions: A Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Article
- Primer on Female Infertility for the Reproductive Urologist.Urology research & practice · 2023Article
- Effect of focused ultrasound ablation and myomectomy on pelvic adhesions in patients with uterine fibroids.American journal of translational research · 2023Article
- Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of a long-term estradiol-releasing stent in rat uterine.Regenerative therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the recurrence, menstruation, and pregnancy outcome in patients with different degrees of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.
methodsFrom February 2017 to January 2020, 300 patients with intrauterine adhesions were recruited in this study. Patients were divided into group A (mild), group B (moderate) and Group C (severe). All patients underwent hysteroscopic adhesion separation. The uterine cavity was re-examined by hysteroscopy 3 months after surgery to evaluate the uterine cavity morphology, the degree and treatment effect of the intrauterine adhesions, menstrual volume, and pregnancy outcomes after 2 years.
resultsCompared to group A, the reconstruction rates of group B and C were lower, and group B was significantly higher than group C. The re-adhesion rate of group C was significantly higher than that of group A and group B, but no significant differences were observed between group A and group B. Furthermore, the efficacy of surgical treatment was evaluated. The treatment effect of group B and group C was not as obvious as that of group A, and group C was worse. The degree of intrauterine adhesions was negatively correlated with pregnancy rate and live birth rate of the fetus. Before treatment, there were significant differences in endometrial vascular index (EVI), blood flow Index (FI), endometrial volume (EV), and vascular blood flow index (VFI) among the three groups of patients with different degrees of adhesion. As the degree of adhesion increased before treatment, blood flow decreased. Surgery significantly improved the clinical symptoms of the three groups of patients. Moreover, the recovery of patients in group A was the best, followed by group B, and group C had the worst recovery.
conclusionThe treatment effect and prognosis of patients were related to the degree of intrauterine adhesions before treatment. As the degree of intrauterine adhesions increased, the treatment effect and prognosis of patients became worse, and intensive treatment was needed. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, trial number ChiCTR1700026770, trial URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/).
Indexed as
Identifiers
35173868PMC8829641What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.