Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173855›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022

Comparison between I-gel

Meng Ning, Weiwei Zhong, Jin Li, Tingting Wang, Yao Lu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng NingDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Weiwei ZhongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Jin LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Tingting WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Yao LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative sore throat (POST) is a common complication following thyroid surgery with an endotracheal tube (ET). The I-gel

methodsIn this trial, 106 patients, classified using the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system, belonging to classes I and II, aged 18-65 years old who were prearranged for elective radical thyroidectomy, were randomly divided into the ET and I-gel

resultsNo significant difference was observed in the incidence of POST 1, 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively (61.2% vs. 51.0%,

conclusionsAlthough the I-gel

Indexed as

endotracheal tubehoarsenessI-gel®Sore throatthyroid surgery

Identifiers

PMID35173855
PMCPMC8829600
OpenAlexW4213393419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.