ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Efficacy of thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy and esophagectomy and analysis of the risk factors for postoperative infection.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the predictive value of time-in-range level for the risk of postoperative infection in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the efficacy of thoracoscopy combined with laparoscopy (TCL) and esophagectomy in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) and analyze the risk factors for postoperative infection.
methodsA total of 122 patients with EC admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into the study group (SG) and the control group (CG), with 61 patients in each group. Patients in the SG were treated with TCL, while patients in the CG were treated with traditional radical surgery for EC. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, swallowing function, length of stay (LOS), number of lymph node dissections, postoperative infection rate, and quality of life in the first month after treatment were recorded and compared between the two groups. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for postoperative infection.
resultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, LOS, and postoperative infection rate of the SG were significantly lower than those of the CG (all
conclusionCompared with traditional radical surgery for EC, TCL and resection can effectively reduce trauma, improve the lymph node dissection rate, promote postoperative recovery, and reduce postoperative infection, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion. Hypoproteinemia, diabetes mellitus, and surgical procedures are independent risk factors for postoperative infection in patients with EC. However, with improved medical technologies, the attention to and understanding of these high-risk factors can effectively improve postoperative infection in EC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35173853PMC8829591W4213392753What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.