ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Clinical and prognostic value of CT perfusion imaging parameters in patients with primary liver cancer after therapy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the value of arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) of CT perfusion in evaluating the postoperative treatment efficacy on liver cancer (LC).
methodsClinical data of 60 patients with LC who were treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for LC in our hospital from Jan. 2015 to Jan. 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. They underwent CT scanning before and after surgery. The change of arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) was analyzed, and its value in efficacy evaluation was assessed.
resultsAfter surgery, the AEF value of the effective group decreased greatly (P<0.05) and was significantly lower than that of the ineffective group (P<0.05). Alpha fetal protein (AFP) of both groups decreased after surgery, with a significantly lower AFP level in the effective group than that in the ineffective group (P<0.05). AEF and AFP were positively correlated. According to the follow-up results, patients with a low AEF level showed a higher survival rate than those with a high level. Cox regression analysis revealed that AEF was an independent factor for patients' prognosis.
conclusionCT perfusion imaging parameters are of high clinical value for patients with primary LC after therapy and can be used as independent factors for their prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35173849PMC8829621W4213393429What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.