Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173804›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2020

Personalized risk prediction of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after stroke thrombolysis using a machine-learning model.

Feng Wang, Yuanhanqing Huang, Yong Xia, Wei Zhang, Kun Fang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Xiaofei Yu, Xin Cheng, Gang Li, Xiaoping Wang and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Advanced Machine Learning Models for Predicting Post-Thrombolysis Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Feng WangDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-4008
Yuanhanqing HuangCollege of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yong XiaIBM, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhangCollege of Electronics and Information Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Kun FangDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyu ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaofei YuDepartment of Neurology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xin ChengDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Gang LiDepartment of Neurology, East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1737-0107
Xiaoping WangDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai TongRen Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Guojun LuoDepartment of Neurology, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Danhong WuDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xueyuan LiuDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Bruce C V CampbellDepartments of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Qiang DongDepartment of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12, Wulumuqi Zhong Road, Jingan District, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Yuwu ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600, Yishan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Tongji University · CNFudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNIBM Research (China) · CNShanghai East Hospital · CNShanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonalized prediction of the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) after stroke thrombolysis is clinically useful. Machine-learning-based modeling may provide the personalized prediction of the risk of sICH after stroke thrombolysis.

methodsWe identified 2578 thrombolysis-treated ischemic stroke patients between January 2013 and December 2016 from a multicenter database, where 70% were used to train models and the remaining 30% were used as the nominal test sets. Another 136 consecutive tissue plasminogen-activated-treated patients between January 2017 and December 2017 from our institute were enrolled as the independent test sets for clinical usability evaluation. Five machine-learning models were developed to predict the risk of sICH after stroke thrombolysis, and the receiving operating characteristic (ROC) was used to compare the prediction performance.

resultsIn total, 2237 cases were included in our study, of which 102 had sICH transformation (4.56%). Finally, the three-layer neuro network was selected with the best performance on nominal test sets (AUC = 0.82). The probability of the model score was further categorized into three risk ranks (18.97%, 5.63%, and 0.81%) according to the risk distribution. Implementing our system in clinical practice was associated with reduced computed tomography (CT)-to-treatment time (CTT; 41 min

conclusionsThe machine-learning-based modeling is feasible for providing personalized risk prediction of sICH after stroke thrombolysis, and is able to reduce the CTT. More data are needed to further optimize the model and improve the accuracy of prediction.

Indexed as

ischemic strokemachine learningpredictionsymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhagethrombolysistPA

Identifiers

PMID35173804
PMCPMC8842114
OpenAlexW3003753298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.