Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173717›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Evaluation of the Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes in China.

Meng-Ting Cai, Song Qiao, Qi-Lun Lai, Yang Zheng, Fan Yang, Gao-Li Fang, Chun-Hong Shen, Yin-Xi Zhang, Mei-Ping Ding

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Meng-Ting CaiDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Song QiaoDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qi-Lun LaiDepartment of Neurology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yang ZhengDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Neurology, People's Hospital of Anyang City, Anyang, China.
Gao-Li FangDepartment of Neurology, Zhejiang Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine Integrated Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Chun-Hong ShenDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yin-Xi ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Mei-Ping DingDepartment of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNIntegrated Chinese Medicine (China) · CNThe Fifth People's Hospital of Anyang · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNZhejiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recently, the paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS) diagnostic criteria have received a major update with a new score system over the past 16 years. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical utility in China. Methods: An eligible cohort of 113 Chinese patients diagnosed with PNSs from the Second Affiliated Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University and published data were enrolled retrospectively. Data including clinical phenotype, antibody type, the presence of cancer, and duration of follow-up were reviewed and re-evaluated to classify the diagnostic levels for the 2004 and 2021 PNS criteria. The performances of these 2 criteria were compared. The critical parameters of antibody and cancer for the updated criteria were further explored. Results: The cohort consisted of 69 males and 44 females with a median age of 60 years. Limbic encephalitis (23, 20.4%), anti-Hu antibody (32, 28.3%), and small-cell lung cancer (32, 28.3%) were the most common clinical phenotype, detected antibody, and concomitant cancer, respectively. A total of 97 (85.8%) patients were diagnosed with definite PNS according to the 2004 criteria: only 42.3% (41/97) fulfilled the 2021 criteria, while the remaining 40, 14, and 2 re-diagnosed with probable PNS, possible PNS, and non-PNS. The requirement of cancers consistent with antibody and phenotype increased the specificity and thus greatly enhanced the accuracy of the 2021 criteria. Conclusion: The updated criteria for PNS emphasized the consistency between cancer phenotype and antibody and showed a better diagnostic value. A better diagnostic yield could benefit disease management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, NeoplasmChinaFemaleHumansLimbic EncephalitisMaleMiddle AgedParaneoplastic Syndromes, Nervous SystemPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Neoplasmantibodycancerclinical phenotypeparaneoplastic neurologic syndromeupdated diagnostic criteria

Identifiers

PMID35173717
PMCPMC8841409
OpenAlexW4210584791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.