ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Evaluation of the Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes in China.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sepsis-Induced Anti-Amphiphysin Antibody-Associated Paraneoplastic Syndrome: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- A case of suspected paraneoplastic nerve syndrome associated with prostate cancer or opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome associated with COVID-19 infection, but symptoms improved after treatment of both.IJU case reports · 2025Article
- Paraneoplastic Syndromes of the Nervous System in Patients Suffering from SCLC. A Review of the Recent Literature.Acta medica academica · 2024Review
- Significant improvement in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes without identifiable anti-neural antibodies in patients with breast cancer after breast surgery.International cancer conference journal · 2024Article
- Clinical Presentation, Management, and Diagnostic Performance of 2021 Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes in Childhood.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2024Article
- Seroprevalence of neuronal antibodies in diseases mimicking autoimmune encephalitis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration Associated with Breast Cancer: A Case Report and a Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes as Initial Presentation of Tumors: An Eight-Year Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Management of Paraneoplastic Syndromes in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Paraneoplastic Syndromes with Peripheral Nerve Damage.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recently, the paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS) diagnostic criteria have received a major update with a new score system over the past 16 years. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical utility in China. Methods: An eligible cohort of 113 Chinese patients diagnosed with PNSs from the Second Affiliated Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University and published data were enrolled retrospectively. Data including clinical phenotype, antibody type, the presence of cancer, and duration of follow-up were reviewed and re-evaluated to classify the diagnostic levels for the 2004 and 2021 PNS criteria. The performances of these 2 criteria were compared. The critical parameters of antibody and cancer for the updated criteria were further explored. Results: The cohort consisted of 69 males and 44 females with a median age of 60 years. Limbic encephalitis (23, 20.4%), anti-Hu antibody (32, 28.3%), and small-cell lung cancer (32, 28.3%) were the most common clinical phenotype, detected antibody, and concomitant cancer, respectively. A total of 97 (85.8%) patients were diagnosed with definite PNS according to the 2004 criteria: only 42.3% (41/97) fulfilled the 2021 criteria, while the remaining 40, 14, and 2 re-diagnosed with probable PNS, possible PNS, and non-PNS. The requirement of cancers consistent with antibody and phenotype increased the specificity and thus greatly enhanced the accuracy of the 2021 criteria. Conclusion: The updated criteria for PNS emphasized the consistency between cancer phenotype and antibody and showed a better diagnostic value. A better diagnostic yield could benefit disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.