Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173493›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental pharmacology2022

The Maximum-Tolerated Dose and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Chemically Modified Curcumin in Rats.

Heta Dinesh Bhatt, Steve A McClain, Hsi-Ming Lee, Thomas Zimmerman, Jie Deng, Francis Johnson, Ying Gu, Lorne M Golub

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Turmeric and Curcumin-Health-Promoting Properties in Humans versus Dogs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Heta Dinesh BhattDepartment of Oral Biology and Pathology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8934-3779
Steve A McClainDepartment of Dermatology and Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, and McClain Laboratories LLC, Smithtown, NY, 11787, USA.
Hsi-Ming LeeDepartment of Oral Biology and Pathology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Thomas ZimmermanDivision of Laboratory Animal Resources (DLAR) at Stony Brook, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9517-3294
Jie DengDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1048-8762
Francis JohnsonDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmacological Sciences, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7796-7653
Ying GuDepartment of General Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Lorne M GolubDepartment of Oral Biology and Pathology, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Stony Brook School · USStony Brook University · USPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCMC 2.24, a chemically modified curcumin, was developed as a novel, pleiotropic MMP-inhibitor to treat various inflammatory/collagenolytic diseases including periodontitis. To date, this compound has shown efficacy in vitro, in cell culture, and in vivo (oral administration) in mice, rats and dogs. In preparation for possible Phase I human clinical trials, the current study describes the maximum-tolerated-dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and toxicology of CMC 2.24 in the rat model.

methodsFor the MTD study, 30 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly distributed into 5 groups (3M/3F per group): Placebo (vehicle; carboxymethylcellulose) and CMC 2.24 at various doses (50, 100, 500, 1000 mg/kg/day), were administered once daily by oral gavage for 5 days. For the PK study, 24 rats were administered either Placebo or CMC 2.24 (100mg/kg/day) once daily for 28 days or only once (500 or 1000 mg/kg). Analysis of this test compound was done using LC/MS/MS for PK evaluation on blood samples drawn from rats at multiple time points. The animals were sacrificed after 5 or 28 days of treatment, and blood chemistry and serology were analyzed. Major organs (heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, intestine, brain) were histologically examined at necropsy.

resultsOrally administered, CMC 2.24 did not produce significant changes in body weight, food consumption or adverse events in the MTD and toxicology studies. Moreover, no obvious pathologic changes were observed based on histology, hematology, serum biochemistry, or necropsy compared to placebo-treated controls. The PK study demonstrated a peak-blood concentration (C

conclusionIn conclusion, CMC 2.24, orally administered to rats once a day, appears to be safe and effective at a wide range of doses, consistent with efficacy previously demonstrated in studies on animal models of various collagenolytic diseases, such as periodontitis, diabetes and cancer.

Indexed as

MMP-inhibitornovel compoundoral administrationtoxicology

Identifiers

PMID35173493
PMCPMC8842656
OpenAlexW4210908826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.