Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173415›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2022

Determining the Minimum Effective Concentration of Ropivacaine in Epidural Anesthesia for Tolerable Pain in Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy to Avoid Nerve Injury: A Double-Blind Study Using a Biased-Coin Design.

Bingwei Hu, Liang Li, Hongwei Wang, Tingting Ma, Zhimei Fu, Xianhui Kang, Zhiying Feng

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of the EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bingwei HuDepartment of Pain, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4484-5043
Liang LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9603-7016
Hongwei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Tingting MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Zhimei FuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2180-234X
Xianhui KangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-3369
Zhiying FengDepartment of Pain, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0962-9449
Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEpidural anesthesia (EA) is the main anesthesia method for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Reducing the concentration of ropivacaine can help preserve tactile sensation, allowing patients to provide timely feedback to the surgeons when a nerve root is contacted to avoid nerve injury. Therefore, a 90% effective concentration (EC

methodsThe concentration of ropivacaine for EA was varied for consecutive patients in this study using a two-stage biased-coin design (BCD) according to the response of the previous patient; the concentration used for the first patient was 0.2%. When the previous patient had a negative response (VAS score >3), the concentration used for the next one was increased by 0.015%. When the previous patient had a positive response (VAS score ≤3), the concentration used for the next one had an 89% probability of remaining the same and an 11% probability of being reduced by 0.015%. The EC

resultsA total of 58 patients were included in the study. The calculated EC

conclusionTo preserve maximum tactile sensation, the EC

Indexed as

Anesthesia, EpiduralDiskectomy, PercutaneousIntervertebral Disc DisplacementDiskectomyDouble-Blind MethodHumansLumbar VertebraePainRetrospective StudiesRopivacaineTreatment OutcomeRopivacainebiased-coin designepidural anesthesiaisotonic regressionminimum effective concentrationropivacainetransforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Identifiers

PMID35173415
PMCPMC8841299
OpenAlexW4210865870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.