ReviewBiology of sport2022
Reference values for collective tactical behaviours based on positional data in professional football matches: a systematic review.
Review in Biology of sport, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Surfing Time-Motion Characteristics Possible to Gain Using Global Navigation Satellite Systems: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Integrating physical and tactical factors in football using positional data: a systematic review.PeerJ · 2022Pooled it
- Optimizing football analytics: Dimensionality reduction meets machine learning for offensive and defensive player profiling.PloS one · 2026Article
- Effects of Different Tactical Formations on Positional Team Behaviors during Small Sided Games in Youth Soccer Players.Journal of human kinetics · 2025Article
- Physical performance discriminating winning and losing in UEFA Champions League: a full-season study.Biology of sport · 2025Article
- More direct attacks increase likelihood of goals in 2018- and 2022-Men's World Cup Soccer Finals.PloS one · 2025Article
- A socio-constructivist framework for tactical development in team sports: fostering critical thinking through collaborative learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Exploring the recurrent states of football teams' tactical organization on the pitch during Brazilian official matches.PloS one · 2024Article
- Tactical critical thinking program on the tactical efficiency index, declarative and procedural knowledge in male soccer players: a case study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Evaluating Physical and Tactical Performance and Their Connection during Female Soccer Matches Using Global Positioning Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Different Sampling Frequencies to Calculate Collective Tactical Variables during Competition: A Case of an Official Female's Soccer Match.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Match collective tactical behaviours can be used as a reference to design and select training strategies to improve individual and team performance in professional football. The aim of the systematic review was to cluster the collective tactical variables used to highlight and compare male soccer teams' collective behaviour during professional official matches, providing reference values for each of them. A systematic review of relevant articles was carried out using three electronic databases (PubMed, SPORTdiscus and Web of Science). From a total of 1,187 studies initially found, 13 original articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. The articles found concerned studies carried out on the Spanish, Portuguese, English and Brazilian 1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.