Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173283›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Engineering eukaryote-like regulatory circuits to expand artificial control mechanisms for metabolic engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Bingyin Peng, Naga Chandra Bandari, Zeyu Lu, Christopher B Howard, Colin Scott, Matt Trau, Geoff Dumsday, Claudia E Vickers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Functional Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Recent advances and future directions on GLA-producing organisms.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Cyanamide-inducible expression of homing nucleaseSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bingyin PengAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. bingyin.peng@qut.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6918-6016
Naga Chandra BandariAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8345-9420
Zeyu LuAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6536-6407
Christopher B HowardAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Colin ScottCSIRO Future Science Platform in Synthetic Biology, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Black Mountain, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6110-6982
Matt TrauAustralian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5516-1280
Geoff DumsdayCSIRO Manufacturing, Clayton, VIC, 3169, Australia.
Claudia E VickersCSIRO Future Science Platform in Synthetic Biology, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Black Mountain, ACT, 2601, Australia. claudia.vickers@csiro.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0792-050X
The University of Queensland · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUCSIRO Manufacturing · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) CE200100029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal control of heterologous pathway expression is critical to achieve optimal efficiency in microbial metabolic engineering. The broadly-used GAL promoter system for engineered yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) suffers from several drawbacks; specifically, unintended induction during laboratory development, and unintended repression in industrial production applications, which decreases overall production capacity. Eukaryotic synthetic circuits have not been well examined to address these problems. Here, we explore a modularised engineering method to deploy new genetic circuits applicable for expanding the control of GAL promoter-driven heterologous pathways in S. cerevisiae. Trans- and cis- modules, including eukaryotic trans-activating-and-repressing mechanisms, were characterised to provide new and better tools for circuit design. A eukaryote-like tetracycline-mediated circuit that delivers stringent repression was engineered to minimise metabolic burden during strain development and maintenance. This was combined with a novel 37 °C induction circuit to relief glucose-mediated repression on the GAL promoter during the bioprocess. This delivered a 44% increase in production of the terpenoid nerolidol, to 2.54 g L

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsMetabolic EngineeringPromoter Regions, GeneticTerpenesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTerpenes

Identifiers

PMID35173283
PMCPMC8850539
OpenAlexW4213327673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.