Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173221›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Automating insect monitoring using unsupervised near-infrared sensors.

Klas Rydhmer, Emily Bick, Laurence Still, Alfred Strand, Rubens Luciano, Salena Helmreich, Brittany D Beck, Christoffer Grønne, Ludvig Malmros, Knud Poulsen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Towards global insect biomonitoring with frugal methods.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Discrimination of Hover Fly Species and Sexes by Wing Interference Signals.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Remote Nanoscopy with Infrared Elastic Hyperspectral Lidar.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Klas RydhmerFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark. klry@faunaphotonics.com.
Emily BickFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Laurence StillFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Alfred StrandFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Rubens LucianoFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Salena HelmreichFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Brittany D BeckFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Christoffer GrønneFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Ludvig MalmrosFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Knud PoulsenFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Frederik ElbækFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Mikkel BrydegaardFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Jesper LemmichFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Thomas NikolajsenFaunaPhotonics APS, Støberigade 14, 2450, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKNorsk Elektro Optikk (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect monitoring is critical to improve our understanding and ability to preserve and restore biodiversity, sustainably produce crops, and reduce vectors of human and livestock disease. Conventional monitoring methods of trapping and identification are time consuming and thus expensive. Automation would significantly improve the state of the art. Here, we present a network of distributed wireless sensors that moves the field towards automation by recording backscattered near-infrared modulation signatures from insects. The instrument is a compact sensor based on dual-wavelength infrared light emitting diodes and is capable of unsupervised, autonomous long-term insect monitoring over weather and seasons. The sensor records the backscattered light at kHz pace from each insect transiting the measurement volume. Insect observations are automatically extracted and transmitted with environmental metadata over cellular connection to a cloud-based database. The recorded features include wing beat harmonics, melanisation and flight direction. To validate the sensor's capabilities, we tested the correlation between daily insect counts from an oil seed rape field measured with six yellow water traps and six sensors during a 4-week period. A comparison of the methods found a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.61 and a p-value = 0.0065, with the sensors recording approximately 19 times more insect observations and demonstrating a larger temporal dynamic than conventional yellow water trap monitoring.

Indexed as

BiodiversityInfrared RaysAnimalsAutomationBiological MonitoringBrassica napusDatabases as TopicInsect VectorsRapeseed OilSeasonsWeatherWireless TechnologyRapeseed Oil

Identifiers

PMID35173221
PMCPMC8850605
OpenAlexW3189985814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.