Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173142›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2022

Acute-stress-induced change in salience network coupling prospectively predicts post-trauma symptom development.

Wei Zhang, Reinoud Kaldewaij, Mahur M Hashemi, Saskia B J Koch, Annika Smit, Vanessa A van Ast, Christian F Beckmann, Floris Klumpers, Karin Roelofs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Time to Address Eating Disorder Risk Among Medical Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei ZhangDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. wzzang@me.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-2033
Reinoud KaldewaijDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mahur M HashemiDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Saskia B J KochDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3628-6712
Annika SmitKnowledge and Research Department, Police Academy of The Netherlands, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7267-8713
Vanessa A van AstDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-2799
Christian F BeckmannDonders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Floris Klumpers *Donders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Karin Roelofs *Donders Institute, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8863-8978
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Humanistic Studies · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial individual differences exist in how acute stress affects large-scale neurocognitive networks, including salience (SN), default mode (DMN), and central executive networks (CEN). Changes in the connectivity strength of these networks upon acute stress may predict vulnerability to long-term stress effects, which can only be tested in prospective longitudinal studies. Using such longitudinal design, we investigated whether the magnitude of acute-stress-induced functional connectivity changes (delta-FC) predicts the development of post-traumatic stress-disorder (PTSD) symptoms in a relatively resilient group of young police students that are known to be at high risk for trauma exposure. Using resting-state fMRI, we measured acute-stress-induced delta-FC in 190 police recruits before (baseline) and after trauma exposure during repeated emergency-aid services (16-month follow-up). Delta-FC was then linked to the changes in perceived stress levels (PSS) and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PCL and CAPS). Weakened connectivity between the SN and DMN core regions upon acute-stress induction at baseline predicted longitudinal increases in perceived-stress level but not of post-traumatic stress symptoms, whereas increased coupling between the overall SN and anterior cerebellum was observed in participants with higher clinician-rated PTSD symptoms, particularly intrusion levels. All the effects remained significant when controlling for trauma-exposure levels and cortisol-stress reactivity. Neither hormonal nor subjective measures exerted similar predictive or acquired effects. The reconfiguration of large-scale neural networks upon acute-stress induction is relevant for assessing and detecting risk and resilience factors for PTSD. This study highlights the SN connectivity-changes as a potential marker for trauma-related symptom development, which is sensitive even in a relatively resilient sample.

Indexed as

Nerve NetStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35173142
PMCPMC8850556
OpenAlexW4212855777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.