Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173136›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2022

Effectiveness of Clipping for Definitive Colonic Diverticular Bleeding in Preventing Early Recurrent Bleeding.

Junnosuke Hayasaka, Daisuke Kikuchi, Hiroyuki Odagiri, Kosuke Nomura, Yorinari Ochiai, Takayuki Okamura, Yugo Suzuki, Yutaka Mitsunaga, Nobuhiro Dan, Masami Tanaka and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junnosuke HayasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Daisuke KikuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Hiroyuki OdagiriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Kosuke NomuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Yorinari OchiaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Takayuki OkamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Yugo SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Yutaka MitsunagaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Nobuhiro DanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Masami TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Satoshi YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Akira MatsuiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Shu HoteyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Japan.
Toranomon Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Clipping is a common technique for managing colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB), despite the lack of published evidence regarding its effectiveness. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of clipping for CDB in preventing early recurrent bleeding. Methods This dual-center retrospective study included 93 patients who underwent emergency hospitalization for bloody stool, diagnosed with definitive CDB, and treated with clipping or conservative treatment. The primary outcome was early recurrent bleeding. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the occurrence of early recurrent bleeding and clipping with adjustment for propensity scores. Secondary outcomes included death, transfusion, length of hospitalization, need for transcatheter arterial embolization or surgery, and adverse events. Results The patient characteristics were similar between the clipping (n=85) and conservative treatment (n=8) groups. The rate of early recurrent bleeding was significantly lower in the clipping group than in the conservative treatment group [23.5% (20 cases) vs. 75% (6 cases), p=0.005]. In the propensity score-adjusted logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio for early recurrent bleeding in the clipping group was 0.094 (95% confidence interval, 0.008-0.633, p=0.026). Secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. Stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) at the time of recurrent bleeding was identified in 79.2% of patients (19/24). In the clipping group, recurrent bleeding was observed in 62.5% of cases (10/16) from the same diverticulum. However, early recurrent bleeding tended to be less likely with direct clipping (p=0.072). Conclusion Clipping for definite CDB was more effective in preventing early recurrent bleeding than conservative treatment.

Indexed as

Diverticular DiseasesDiverticulum, ColonColonoscopyGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansRetrospective Studiesclippingcolonic diverticular bleedingcolonoscopyearly recurrent bleeding

Identifiers

PMID35173136
PMCPMC8907776
OpenAlexW4212922961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.