Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173022›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

A mixed-methods study of maternal health care utilisation in six referral hospitals in four sub-Saharan African countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Aline Semaan, Dinah Amongin, Ochuwa Babah, Nafissatou Dioubate, Amani Kikula, Sarah Nakubulwa, Olubunmi Ogein, Moses Adroma, William Anzo Adiga and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Aduragbemi Banke-ThomasSchool of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK a.bankethomas@gre.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4449-0131
Aline SemaanDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Dinah AmonginDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-1420-005X
Ochuwa BabahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Nafissatou DioubateCentre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maférinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.
Amani KikulaMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Sarah NakubulwaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Olubunmi OgeinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Moses AdromaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
William Anzo AdigaMulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Abdourahmane DialloMaternité de l'Hôpital National Ignace Deen de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.
Lamine DialloMaternité de l'Hôpital Régional de Mamou, Mamou, Guinea.
Mamadou Cellou DialloMaternité de l'Hôpital National Ignace Deen de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.
Cécé MaomouMaternité de l'Hôpital Régional de Mamou, Mamou, Guinea.
Nathanael MtinangiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Telly SyMaternité de l'Hôpital National Ignace Deen de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.
Therese DelvauxDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Bosede Bukola AfolabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-7567
Alexandre DelamouCentre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maférinyah, Forécariah, Guinea.ORCID 0000-0002-9397-7106
Annettee NakimuliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Andrea Barnabas PembeMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Lenka BenovaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn sub-Saharan Africa, referral hospitals are important sources of key maternal health services, especially during a crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This study prospectively assessed the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal health service utilisation in six large referral hospitals in Guinea, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda during the first year of the pandemic.

methodsMixed-methods design combining three data sources: (1) quantitative data based on routine antenatal, childbirth and postnatal care data collected March 2019-February 2021, (2) qualitative data from recurring rounds of semi-structured interviews conducted July 2020-February 2021 with 22 maternity skilled heath personnel exploring their perceptions of service utilisation and (3) timeline data of COVID-19 epidemiology, global, national and hospital-level events. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed separately, framed based on the timeline analysis and triangulated when reporting.

resultsThree periods including a first wave, slow period and second wave were identified. Maternal health service utilisation was lower during the pandemic compared with the prepandemic year in all but one selected referral hospital. During the pandemic, service utilisation was particularly lower during the waves and higher or stable during the slow period. Fear of being infected in hospitals, lack of transportation, and even when available, high cost of transportation and service closures were key reasons affecting utilisation during the waves. However, community perception that the pandemic was over or insinuation by Government of the same appeared to stabilise use of referral hospitals for childbirth.

conclusionUtilisation of maternal health services across the continuum of care varied through the different periods and across countries. In crisis situations such as COVID-19, restrictions and service closures need to be implemented with consideration given to alternative options for women to access and use services. Information on measures put in place for safe hospital use should be communicated to women.

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesFemaleHospitalsHumansPandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2TanzaniaCOVID-19descriptive studyhealth services researchmaternal healthobstetrics

Identifiers

PMID35173022
PMCPMC8852239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.