Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35173007›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Variation in appropriate diabetes care and treatment targets in urban and rural areas in England: an observational study of the 'rule of halves'.

Thomas Mason, William Whittaker, Jo C Dumville, Peter Bower

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pre-pandemic diabetes and risk of long COVID: longitudinal evidence.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Rural-urban disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and diabetes among aging Indians.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Is the "Rule of Halves" Applicable for Diabetes Mellitus? A Cross-Sectional Study in a Coastal Area of Karnataka, India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas MasonFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK thomas.mason@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3135-0364
William WhittakerFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2530-0360
Jo C DumvilleFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peter BowerFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9558-3349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the 'rule of halves' for diabetes care for urban and rural areas in England using several data sources covering the period 2015-2017; and to examine the extent to which any differences in urban and rural settings are explained by population characteristics and the workforce supply of primary care providers (general practices).

designA retrospective observational study.

settingPopulations resident in predominantly urban and rural areas in England (2015-2017).

participantsN=33 336 respondents to the UK Household Longitudinal Survey in urban and rural settings in England; N=4913 general practices in England reporting to the National Diabetes Audit and providing workforce data to NHS Digital. OUTCOMES: Diabetes prevalence; administrative records of diagnoses of diabetes; provision of (all eight) recommended diabetes care processes; diabetes treatment targets.

resultsDiabetes prevalence was higher in urban areas in England (7.80% (95% CI 7.30% to 8.31%)) relative to rural areas (7.24% (95% CI 6.32% to 8.16%)). For practices in urban areas, relatively fewer cases of diabetes were recorded in administrative medical records (69.55% vs 71.86%), and a smaller percentage of those registered received the appropriate care (45.85% vs 49.32%). Among estimated prevalent cases of diabetes, urban areas have a 24.84% achieving these targets compared with 25.16% in rural areas. However, adjusted analyses showed that the performance of practices in urban areas in providing appropriate care quality was not significantly different from practices in rural areas.

conclusionsThe 'rule of halves' is not an accurate description of the actual pattern across the diabetes care pathway in England. More than half of the estimated urban and rural diabetes population are registered with clinical practices and have access to treatment. However, less than half of those registered for treatment have achieved treatment targets. Appropriate care quality was associated with a greater proportion of patients with diabetes achieving treatment targets.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHumansPrevalenceQuality of Health CareRural PopulationUrban PopulationWorkforceepidemiologygeneral diabetesorganisation of health servicesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35173007
PMCPMC8852726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.