Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2022
Actively implementing an evidence-based feeding guideline for critically ill patients (NEED): a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical pathways for secondary care and the effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Association of energy delivery with short-term survival in mechanically ventilated critically ill adult patients: a secondary analysis of the NEED trial.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Trial
- Therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with sepsis: Secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2023Trial
- Association between age and outcomes of evidence-based feeding protocol versus usual care in critically ill patients: secondary analysis of a multicenter cluster-randomised controlled trial.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to enteral nutrition interruptions among intensive care unit nurses.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Beyond Early Initiation: Predictors of Successful Early Enteral Nutrition Advancement in Critically Ill Patients.Nutrients · 2026Article
- External validation of the feeding intolerance prediction model (NOFI) in critically ill patients: A post hoc analysis of a large-scale randomized controlled trial.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Metabolic acidosis and sodium bicarbonate therapy in critically ill patients: A multinational survey of international and Chinese practitioners.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a multidisciplinary cooperative nutrition management process for critically ill patients-a Delphi expert consensus study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Which critically ill patients are more susceptible to the adverse effects associated with feeding intolerance? A secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Continuous peptide-based versus sequential standard polymeric enteral nutrition formula in critically ill patients with acute gastrointestinal injury: study protocol for a single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advancements in research on feeding intolerance to enteral nutrition in neurocritical patients undergoing sedation and analgesia.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of the gastrointestinal dysfunction score versus acute gastrointestinal injury grade for short-term risk stratification in critically ill patients: evidence from two prospective cohorts.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The effect of pectin-supplemented enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients receiving gastric feeding: protocol of a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (the PROMOTE trial).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Early enteral nutrition in critically-ill patients.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence assisted nutritional risk evaluation model for critically ill patients: Integration of explainable machine learning in intensive care nutrition.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Article
- Enhanced metabolic regulation in II/R injury: Comparing multiroute and monoroute enteral nutrition.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2025Article
- The Japanese Critical Care Nutrition Guideline 2024.Journal of intensive care · 2025Review
- Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a secondary analysis of a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
99 authors at 20 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious cluster-randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of implementing evidence-based guidelines for nutrition therapy in critical illness do not consistently demonstrate patient benefits. A large-scale, sufficiently powered study is therefore warranted to ascertain the effects of guideline implementation on patient-centered outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter, cluster-randomized, parallel-controlled trial in intensive care units (ICUs) across China. We developed an evidence-based feeding guideline. ICUs randomly allocated to the guideline group formed a local "intervention team", which actively implemented the guideline using standardized educational materials, a graphical feeding protocol, and live online education outreach meetings conducted by members of the study management committee. ICUs assigned to the control group remained unaware of the guideline content. All ICUs enrolled patients who were expected to stay in the ICU longer than seven days. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 28 days of enrollment.
resultsForty-eight ICUs were randomized to the guideline group and 49 to the control group. From March 2018 to July 2019, the guideline ICUs enrolled 1399 patients, and the control ICUs enrolled 1373 patients. Implementation of the guideline resulted in significantly earlier EN initiation (1.20 vs. 1.55 mean days to initiation of EN; difference - 0.40 [95% CI - 0.71 to - 0.09]; P = 0.01) and delayed PN initiation (1.29 vs. 0.80 mean days to start of PN; difference 1.06 [95% CI 0.44 to 1.67]; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality (14.2% vs. 15.2%; difference - 1.6% [95% CI - 4.3% to 1.2%]; P = 0.42) between groups.
conclusionsIn this large-scale, multicenter trial, active implementation of an evidence-based feeding guideline reduced the time to commencement of EN and overall PN use but did not translate to a reduction in mortality from critical illness.
trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN12233792 . Registered November 20th, 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.