SynthesisOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022
Risk factors for pregnancy-related clinical outcome in myasthenia gravis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Safety of Ravulizumab Use in Pregnancy: Insights from a Global Pharmacovigilance Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Medication use trajectories in myasthenia gravis pregnancies: a population-based drug utilization study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Women and Myasthenia Gravis.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2026Article
- Nomogram for predicting pregnancy-related relapse of myasthenia gravis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Transient Neonatal Myasthenia Gravis as a Common Complication of a Rare Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Choices and Challenges With Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- The burden of myasthenia gravis - highlighting the impact on family planning and the role of social support.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Immunotherapies in MuSK-positive Myasthenia Gravis; an IgG4 antibody-mediated disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMyasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder that frequently affects females at reproductive age. Herein, we aimed to assess the associations of clinical factors with pregnancy-related outcome in MG.
methodsWe searched PubMed and EMBASE for case-control and cohort studies that reported the MG status during or after pregnancy and relevant clinical variables. The data was extracted in proportions and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in subsequent meta-analysis.
resultsFifteen eligible articles reporting on 734 pregnancies with 193 worsening and 51 improved episodes were included out of 1765 records. The estimated worsening proportions in total, antepartum and postpartum periods were 0.36 (95% CI 0.25-0.40), 0.23 (95% CI 0.14-0.34) and 0.11 (95% CI 0.04-0.22) respectively. The proportion of pregnancy-related improvement in enrolled patients was 0.28 (95% CI 0.17-0.40), with 0.07 (95% CI 0.00-0.28) during pregnancy and 0.14 (95% CI 0.02-0.34) after pregnancy. No significant associations were disclosed between the clinical factors and MG worsening. Thymectomy before delivery is a strong predictor for MG improvement in postpartum period (OR 4.85, 95% CI 1.88-12.50, p = 0.001).
conclusionThe total proportion of pregnancy-related MG worsening and improvement in MG was 0.36 (95% CI 0.25-0.40) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.17-0.40), respectively. Thymectomy before the delivery may aid in clinical improvements associated with pregnancy. Future prospective cohort studies are required to determine more relevant factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.