Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35172823›Full record

ReviewCancer cell international2022

Clinicopathological and prognostic value of SIRT6 in patients with solid tumors: a meta-analysis and TCGA data review.

Xiaojing Wu, Shuyuan Wang, Xuanzhu Zhao, Sizhen Lai, Zhen Yuan, Yixiang Zhan, Kemin Ni, Zhaoce Liu, Lina Liu, Ran Xin and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer cell international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaojing Wu *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China.
Shuyuan Wang *School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Xuanzhu Zhao *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China.
Sizhen Lai *Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China.
Zhen YuanSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Yixiang ZhanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China.
Kemin NiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China.
Zhaoce LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China.
Lina LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China.
Ran XinSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Xingyu ZhouSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Xin YinSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Xinyu LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China.
Xipeng ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China.
Wei CuiSchool of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China. weicui@nankai.edu.cn.
Chunze ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, China. chunze.zhang@nankai.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-5631
Nankai University · CNTianjin People's Hospital · CNTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

the Key R&D Projects in the Tianjin Science and Technology Pillar Program 19YFZCSY00420the National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC1700604the National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC1700606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesIn addition to its role in cellular progression and cancer, SIRT6, a member of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD

methodsThe databases PubMed and ISI Web of Science were searched for relevant literature, and the results were presented here. Using Stata16.0, a meta-analysis was conducted to determine the impact of SIRT6 on clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in malignancy patients. The results were published in the journal Cancer Research. The dataset from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was used to investigate the prognostic significance of SIRT6 in various types of tumors.

resultsThe inclusion and exclusion criteria were met by 15 studies. In patients with solid tumours, reduced SIRT6 expression was found to be related with improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.45-0.97, P < 0.001) as well as improved disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.26-0.91, P < 0.001). Low SIRT6 expression was found to be associated with a better OS in breast cancer (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.27-0.89, P = 0.179), but was found to be associated with a worse OS in gastrointestinal cancer (gastric cancer and colon cancer) (HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.20-2.79, P = 0.939) after subgroup analysis. In terms of clinicopathological characteristics, SIRT6 expression was found to be linked with distant metastasis (OR = 2.98, 95% CI = 1.59-5.57, P = 0.694). When the data from the TCGA dataset was compared to normal tissue, it was discovered that SIRT6 expression was significantly different in 11 different types of cancers. Meanwhile, reduced SIRT6 expression was shown to be associated with improved OS (P < 0.05), which was consistent with the findings of the meta-analysis. Aside from that, the expression of SIRT6 was found to be associated with both gender and clinical stage.

conclusionThe overall data of the present meta-analysis indicated that low expression of SIRT6 may predict a favorable survival for patients with solid tumors.

Indexed as

Meta-analysisPrognosisSIRT6Solid tumors

Identifiers

PMID35172823
PMCPMC8848894
OpenAlexW4212893689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.