Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35172815›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2022

The precedence effect in spatial hearing manifests in cortical neural population responses.

Kongyan Li, Ryszard Auksztulewicz, Chloe H K Chan, Ambika Prasad Mishra, Jan W H Schnupp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kongyan LiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Ryszard AuksztulewiczDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Chloe H K ChanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Ambika Prasad MishraDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Jan W H SchnuppDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Department of Neuroscience, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China. wschnupp@cityu.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-0057
City University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo localize sound sources accurately in a reverberant environment, human binaural hearing strongly favors analyzing the initial wave front of sounds. Behavioral studies of this "precedence effect" have so far largely been confined to human subjects, limiting the scope of complementary physiological approaches. Similarly, physiological studies have mostly looked at neural responses in the inferior colliculus, the main relay point between the inner ear and the auditory cortex, or used modeling of cochlear auditory transduction in an attempt to identify likely underlying mechanisms. Studies capable of providing a direct comparison of neural coding and behavioral measures of sound localization under the precedence effect are lacking.

resultsWe adapted a "temporal weighting function" paradigm previously developed to quantify the precedence effect in human for use in laboratory rats. The animals learned to lateralize click trains in which each click in the train had a different interaural time difference. Computing the "perceptual weight" of each click in the train revealed a strong onset bias, very similar to that reported for humans. Follow-on electrocorticographic recording experiments revealed that onset weighting of interaural time differences is a robust feature of the cortical population response, but interestingly, it often fails to manifest at individual cortical recording sites.

conclusionWhile previous studies suggested that the precedence effect may be caused by early processing mechanisms in the cochlea or inhibitory circuitry in the brainstem and midbrain, our results indicate that the precedence effect is not fully developed at the level of individual recording sites in the auditory cortex, but robust and consistent precedence effects are observable only in the auditory cortex at the level of cortical population responses. This indicates that the precedence effect emerges at later cortical processing stages and is a significantly "higher order" feature than has hitherto been assumed.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexInferior ColliculiSound LocalizationAcoustic StimulationAnimalsHearingHumansAuditory cortexNeural decodingOnset dominancePrecedence effectRatTemporal weighting function

Identifiers

PMID35172815
PMCPMC8848659
OpenAlexW4212980428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.