Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35172752›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

The experiences of people with type 2 diabetes in communicating with general practitioners in China - a primary care focus group study.

Mi Yao, Dong-Ying Zhang, Jie-Ting Fan, Kai Lin, Shamil Haroon, Dawn Jackson, Hai Li, Wei Chen, Kar Keung Cheng, Richard Lehman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mi YaoInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Dong-Ying ZhangNational Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jie-Ting FanDepartment of Endocrinology, PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, China.
Kai LinFamily Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Shamil HaroonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. S.Haroon@bham.ac.uk.
Dawn JacksonCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Hai LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510 080, China. chenwei99@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Kar Keung ChengInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Richard LehmanInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBSun Yat-sen University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the implementation of health care reforms in China, primary care is on a journey to provide care for most patients with type 2 diabetes. While Chinese general practitioners (GPs) have described challenges in communication with diabetes patients in their daily practice, little is known about patients' experiences in communicating with their GPs.

methodsFive focus groups (of 4-5 participants each) were used to explore views from patients with type 2 diabetes. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a spread of participants from general practices in Guangzhou city, China. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using the Framework Method.

resultsTen males and 12 female patients from five general practices participated in focus group discussions, with a mean age of 57.3 years and 7.3 years of diabetes duration. Five main themes emerged: patients' understanding about diabetes, diabetes medication, communication with GPs, physician-patient relationships, and healthcare systems and context. Patients generally searched for information on the internet, but they weren't always sure if it was trustworthy. Several communication needs were described by diabetes patients, such as explanation of blood glucose monitoring, medication information support, communication in the risk of diabetes complications and cardiovascular disease, and language barriers. Communication was frequently brief and not tailored to their concerns, and some described being scolded or panicked by GPs. Participants acknowledged the pressures within the health system, such as short consultation times, an incoherent GP-hospital interface and high demand.

conclusionsKey issues from the patients' perspective for the development of primary care based management of diabetes in China were identified. People with type 2 diabetes require more access to trustworthy diabetes information and wish for better channels of communication with their GPs. Strategies may be required to improve GPs' communication skills with their patients that also consider the context of the wider health system environment in China.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2General PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringChinaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchBlood GlucoseCommunicationGeneral practicePatientsType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35172752
PMCPMC8812222
OpenAlexW4210471939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.