ArticleBMC primary care2022
General practitioners' experiences with, views of, and attitudes towards, general practice-based pharmacists: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspectives of patients on the role of general practice pharmacists: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC primary care · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical pharmacist-led interventions and their impact on outcomes in patients with bipolar I disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring the readiness of Pakistani pharmacists to become independent prescribers: A qualitative study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Physicians' Perspectives on Collaboration with Community Pharmacists: Implications for Collaborative Care in Jordan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patients' Perspectives on the Role of General Practice-Based Pharmacists: A Focus Group Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Unpacking the value of pharmacists in team-based primary care in British Columbia, Canada: a qualitative evaluation.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Confidence, Barriers, and Role Identity of General Practice Independent Pharmacist Prescribers in Northern Ireland.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical pharmacist prescriber in primary care in Slovenia: prospective non-randomised interventional study focused on clinical outcomes and quality of life.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Pharmacist prescriber implementation in the experiences of general practitioners, pharmacist prescribers and patients: qualitative study based on pilot trial in Slovenia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- An exploration of Northern Ireland general practice pharmacists' views on their role in general practice: a cross-sectional survey.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Negotiating new roles in general practice: a qualitative study of clinical pharmacists.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- Integration and impact of pharmacists in general practice internationally: A rapid review.Journal of health services research & policy · 2024Review
- GPs' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practices: A mixed methods survey study.The European journal of general practice · 2023Article
- Article
- General practitioners' attitudes towards and frequency of collaboration with pharmacists in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- GPs' and pharmacists' views of integrating pharmacists into general practices: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Article
- General practitioners' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practice: a qualitative interview study.Family practice · 2023Article
- Interprofessional collaboration within general practice teams following the inclusion of non-dispensing pharmacists.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023Article
- Provider survey of the roles of clinical pharmacists in primary care in a Federally Qualified Health Center versus an Accountable Care Organization.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited United Kingdom (UK) literature on general practice-based pharmacists' (PBPs') role evolution and few studies have explored general practitioners' (GPs') experiences on pharmacist integration into general practice. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate GPs' experiences with, views of, and attitudes towards PBPs in Northern Ireland (NI).
methodsA paper-based self-administered questionnaire comprising four sections was mailed in 2019 to 329 general practices across NI and was completed by one GP in every practice who had most contact with the PBP. Descriptive analyses were used and responses to open-ended questions were analysed thematically.
resultsThe response rate was 61.7% (203/329). There was at least one PBP per general practice. All GPs had face-to-face meetings with PBPs, with three-quarters (78.7%, n = 159) meeting with the PBP more than once a week. Approximately two-thirds of GPs (62.4%, n = 126) reported that PBPs were qualified as independent prescribers, and 76.2% of these (n = 96/126) indicated that prescribers were currently prescribing for patients. The majority of GPs reported that PBPs always/very often had the required clinical skills (83.6%, n = 162) and knowledge (87.0%, n = 167) to provide safe and effective care for patients. However, 31.1% (n = 61) stated that PBPs only sometimes had the confidence to make clinical decisions. The majority of GPs (> 85%) displayed largely positive attitudes towards collaboration with PBPs. Most GPs agreed/strongly agreed that PBPs will have a positive impact on patient outcomes (95.0%, n = 192) and can provide a better link between general practices and community pharmacists (96.1%, n = 194). However, 24.8% of GPs (n = 50) were unclear if the PBP role moved community pharmacists to the periphery of the primary care team. An evaluation of the free-text comments indicated that GPs were in favour of more PBP sessions and full-time posts.
conclusionMost GPs had positive views of, and attitudes towards, PBPs. The findings may have implications for future developments in order to extend integration of PBPs within general practice, including the enhancement of training in clinical skills and decision-making. Exploring PBPs', community pharmacists' and patients' views of this role in general practice is required to corroborate study findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.