ReviewBMC primary care2022
What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: an integrative review.
Review in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- HealthCare Complexity Index (HCIn): A Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Primary Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and content validation of an interprofessional collaboration model for child sexual abuse prevention in primary health care.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- A multi-regional survey of empathy and its associated factors among community pharmacists within a national pharmacy network in Japan.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The scope of practice of nurses and allied health professionals in primary care in Ontario, Canada: a scoping review.Family practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Nurses' Experiences of Interprofessional Collaboration in Digitally Supported Hospital Discharge Planning: Qualitative Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Core values and best practice criteria for interprofessional teams in primary care: a qualitative interview study with general practitioners and other health professionals from Bavaria, Germany.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Patient experiences with collaborative practices between primary and specialized care in Norwegian cancer pathways: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Concept Analysis.Journal of caring sciences · 2025Review
- What Community Members With Chronic Illness Teach Future Healthcare Professionals in a Longitudinal Interprofessional Education Program: A Focus Group Study.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Integrating Social Work Throughout the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Trajectory to Improve Patient and Caregiver Outcomes.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Review
- Qualitative study on the perceived enablers and barriers to interprofessional education in primary care in Singapore.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Examining the Reasons for Patient No-Show in an Outpatient Adult Rehabilitation Department in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Patient experience and primary care teams: a cross-sectional survey of French elderly patients.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Patients' experience of integrated nursing care in general practices in Switzerland: a mixed-methods study.Family practice · 2025Article
- Recognition at the Heart of the Complex Situations Experienced by People With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Article
- How patients experience nurse-doctor collaborative care at specialist clinics: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Coordination of Care Between a Primary Care Physician and a Chiropractic Resident for the Management of Meralgia Paresthetica: A Case Report.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2025Article
- Characteristics of the practice of New Zealand osteopaths who manage patients with chronic pain.Pain management · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproving the patient experience is one of the quadruple aims of healthcare. Therefore, understanding patient experiences and perceptions of healthcare interactions is paramount to quality improvement. This integrative review aimed to explore how patients with chronic conditions experience Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care.
methodsAn integrative review was conducted to comprehensively synthesize primary studies that used qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Databases searched were Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science on June 1st, 2021. Eligible studies were empirical full-text studies in primary care that reported experiences or perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice by adult patients with a chronic condition, in any language published in any year. Quality appraisal was conducted on included studies using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Data on patients' experiences and perceptions of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice in primary care were extracted, and findings were thematically analyzed through a meta-synthesis.
resultsForty-eight (n = 48) studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of n = 3803 participants. Study quality of individual studies was limited by study design, incomplete reporting, and the potential for positive publication bias. Three themes and their sub-themes were developed inductively: (1) Interacting with Healthcare Teams, subthemes: widening the network, connecting with professionals, looking beyond the condition, and overcoming chronic condition collectively; (2) Valuing Convenient Healthcare, subthemes: sharing space and time, care planning creates structure, coordinating care, valuing the general practitioner role, and affording healthcare; (3) Engaging Self-care, subthemes: engaging passively is circumstantial, and, engaging actively and leading care.
conclusionsPatients overwhelmingly had positive experiences of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice, signaling it is appropriate for chronic condition management in primary care. The patient role in managing their chronic condition was closely linked to their experience. Future studies should investigate how the patient role impacts the experience of patients, carers, and health professionals in this context. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42020156536.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.