Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35172707›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

Advances in the progress of monoclonal antibodies for rabies.

Linlin Fan, Li Zhang, Jingxin Li, Fengcai Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in India: a SWOT analysis.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linlin FanCenter for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China.
Li ZhangVaccine Clinical Evaluation Department, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, PR China.
Jingxin LiCenter for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China.
Fengcai ZhuCenter for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China.
Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies is a highly fatal zoonotic disease caused by the rabies virus invading the central nervous system. When suspected of exposure to the rabies virus, post-exposure prophylaxis should be administered as soon as possible. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) neutralizing the rabies virus could be better in human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis than equine or human rabies immune globulin in terms of supply, cost, and efficacy. This article reviews anti-rabies mAbs produced by multiple techniques, and the results of clinical trials for anti-rabies mAbs cocktails recognizing non-overlapping epitopes are also discussed.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalRabiesRabies VaccinesRabies virusAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHorsesNeutralization TestsPost-Exposure ProphylaxisAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalRabies Vaccinesantibody cocktailantibody libraryglycoproteinmonoclonal antibodyRabies virus

Identifiers

PMID35172707
PMCPMC8993100
OpenAlexW4213004539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.