Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35172632›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and human retroviruses2022

Understanding Retention in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care in the South: Insights from an Academic HIV Prevention Clinic.

Charles M Burns, Monica Borges, Justin Frye, Kathryn Keicher, Scotty Elliott, Sheila Schwartz, Kenneth Shipp, Nwora Lance Okeke, Mehri S McKellar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charles M BurnsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4183-0532
Monica BorgesDuke Center for AIDS Research, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Justin FryeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kathryn KeicherDepartment of Case Management and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Scotty ElliottDepartment of Case Management and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sheila SchwartzDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kenneth ShippDepartment of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Nwora Lance OkekeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mehri S McKellarDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA)- T32T32AI007392 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Amy Lynn Corneli, Guido Ferrari · 1990 to 2026
$9.8M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is poorly utilized in the southern United States. We examined PrEP retention in care and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) through a retrospective review of the Duke University PrEP Clinic from January 1, 2015 to October 15, 2019. We evaluated short-term (3 months), long-term (additional 8-12 months), and longitudinal retention in care in our clinic. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were generated to explore demographics associated with retention. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to view retention longitudinally. STIs were examined at baseline (1 year before initial PrEP visit) and while retained in care. Of a total of 255 patients; 88% were men, 37% were black, and 73% were men who have sex with men (MSM). Short- and long-term retention in care were met by 130/237 (55%) and 80/217 (37%) patients, respectively. MSM were more likely to be retained in the short term (aOR = 5.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.57-17.32). Self-referred patients were more likely to be retained in the long term (aOR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.12-4.23). Uninsured patients were less likely to be retained in the long term (aOR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.11-0.91). STI diagnoses include 42 infections at baseline and 69 infections during follow-up. STI diagnosed while in PrEP care was associated with longer retention in care over time. Patients discontinue PrEP care over time and STIs were frequently encountered. Additional studies are needed to determine the best way to retain patients in HIV preventative care.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleUnited StatesHIVpersistence in carepre-exposure prophylaxissexually transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID35172632
PMCPMC9048170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.