Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35172401›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2022

[Open reduction and internal fixation with plate via posteromedial approach of retaining pes anserinus tendon in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture].

Xinlong Zhang, Wentao Ci, Shi Yan, Kaiwen Luo, Shuai Yan, Qingzhu Zhang, Xuelian Yin, Yi Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinlong ZhangDepartment of Trauma Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde Hebei, 067000, P. R. China.
Wentao CiDepartment of Trauma Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde Hebei, 067000, P. R. China.
Shi YanDepartment of Trauma Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde Hebei, 067000, P. R. China.
Kaiwen LuoDepartment of Trauma Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde Hebei, 067000, P. R. China.
Shuai YanDepartment of Trauma Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde Hebei, 067000, P. R. China.
Qingzhu ZhangDepartment of Trauma Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde Hebei, 067000, P. R. China.
Xuelian YinDepartment of Trauma Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde Hebei, 067000, P. R. China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Trauma Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde Hebei, 067000, P. R. China.
Chengde Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effects of cutting and retaining the pes anserinus tendon on effectiveness following tibial plateau fracture.

methodsA clinical data of 40 patients with tibial plateau fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation with plate via posteromedial approach between January 2015 and January 2020 was retrospectively analyzed, including 18 patients retained the pes anserinus tendon (study group) and 22 patients cut the pes anserinus tendon (control group) during operation. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side of affected knee, cause of injury, Schatzker classification, time from injury to operation, and associated ligament injury between the two groups (

resultsThe patients in both groups were followed up 12-15 months with an average of 12.8 months. There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fracture healing time between the two groups (

conclusionCompared with traditional pes anserinus tendon cutting group, pes anserinus tendon retaining group can significantly reduce postoperative short-term pain, improve postoperative knee range of motion and knee function within 1 year after operation.

Indexed as

Tibial FracturesBone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansRetrospective StudiesTendonsTreatment Outcomecomplicationknee range of motionpes anserinus tendonsoft tissue injuryTibial plateau fracture

Identifiers

PMID35172401
PMCPMC8863538
OpenAlexW4213078023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.