Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35172390›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2022

Nurse leader agency: Creating an environment conducive to support for graduate nurses.

Ashlyn Sahay, Eileen Willis, Debra Kerr, Bodil Rasmussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashlyn SahaySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Mackay, Queensland, Australia.
Eileen WillisSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Mackay, Queensland, Australia.
Debra KerrSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.
Bodil RasmussenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Deakin University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the study was to gain insight on how nurse leaders manage a culture of safety for graduate nurses.

backgroundCurrent theoretical approaches to safety culture tend towards a checklist approach that focuses on institutional characteristics, failing to examine the quality of interpersonal relationships. These interpersonal interactions are often seen as separate from the institutional realities of resource allocation, nurse-patient ratios, patient acuity or throughput. A theoretical approach is required to illuminate the dialectic between the structure of an organisation and the agency created by nurse leaders to promote patient safety.

designQualitative exploratory descriptive study.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were undertaken with 24 nurse leaders from hospital and aged care settings. Thematic analysis and Giddens structuration theory was used to describe the findings.

resultsNurse leaders identified a range of reciprocal communicative and cultural norms and values, decision-making processes, personal nursing philosophies, strategies and operational procedures to foster patient safety and mentor graduate nurses. The mentoring of graduate nurses included fostering critical thinking, building and affirming formal structural practices such as handover, teamwork, medication protocols and care plans.

conclusionsThe study provides insight into how nurse leaders foster a culture of safety. Emphasis is placed on how agency in nurse leaders creates an environment conducive to learning and support for graduate nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse leadership functions and decision-making capacity hinges on multiple factors including practicing agency and aspects of the social structure such as the rules for safe communication, and the various institutional protocols. Nurse leaders enforce these forms of engagement and practice through their legitimation as leaders. They have both allocative and authoritative resources; they can command resources, direct staff to attend to patients and/or clinical tasks, mentor, guide, assign, correct and encourage with the authority vested in them by the formal structure of the organisation. In doing so, they sustain the structure and reinforce it.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, GraduateNursesAgedHumansLeadershipMentorsPatient Safetyagencygraduate nursesnurse leaderspatient safetystructuration theorystructure

Identifiers

PMID35172390
PMCPMC9313836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.