Observational studyAmerican journal of ophthalmology2022
Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression in the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): Eleven Years of Follow-up.
Observational study in American journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Calculation in the Medication Arm of the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaTrial
- Visual Field Progression Rate and Laminar Depth and Curvature in the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES).Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Glaucomatous Remodeling of the Lamina Cribrosa: Association With Visual Field Progression.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Racial-ethnic disparities in concurrent rates of peripapillary & macular OCT parameters among a large glaucomatous clinical population.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Exploring ethnic and racial differences in intraocular pressure and glaucoma: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on aging.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Social determinants of health and health disparities in glaucoma: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Proactive Decision Support for Glaucoma Treatment: Predicting Surgical Interventions with Clinically Available Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Risk factors for structural and functional progression of primary open-angle glaucoma in an African ancestry cohort.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Social Factors Associated with the Risk of Glaucoma Suspect Conversion to Glaucoma: Analysis of the Nationwide All of Us Program.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaArticle
- Optic Disc Size and Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thinning in Glaucoma.Ophthalmology. GlaucomaObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the rates of visual field (VF) progression between individuals of Black and White race and to investigate whether treatment effects may help explain differences previously reported between racial groups.
designMulticenter prospective observational cohort study.
methodsParticipants were patients in referral tertiary care glaucoma clinics with open angle glaucoma. Eyes were excluded who had <5 VF tests and <2 years of follow-up or any disease that could affect the optic nerve or the VF. The VF mean deviation (MD) slopes over time (dB/y) were calculated with linear regression models. Socioeconomic variables, rates of glaucoma surgery, medications, treated intraocular pressure (IOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were investigated.
resultsA total of 516 eyes were included with a mean (95% CI) follow-up time of 11.0 (range, 10.5-11.5) years and 15.0 (range, 14.1-15.8) visits. Participants of Black race were significantly younger (59.7 vs 66.9 years, P < .01) than those of White race. The mean CCT and socioeconomic variables were similar between Black and White groups (P = 0.20 and P = .56, respectively), as were treatment with topical medications (P = .90) and the rate of VF MD change (-0.24 [-0.31 to -0.17] dB/year vs -0.32 [-0.36 to -0.27], P = .11), despite higher treated mean IOP (14.9 [14.5 to 15.4] vs 14.0 [13.6 to 14.4] mm Hg, P = .03) and fewer trabeculectomies (29.5% vs 50.0%, P < .01) in the Black race group.
conclusionsRates of VF progression were similar despite higher treated IOP in the Black race group. Mitigation of health access disparities in this study may have equalized previously reported different rates of VF progression between racial groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.