Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35172087›Full record

ArticleHealthcare informatics research2022

Protected Health Information Recognition by Fine-Tuning a Pre-training Transformer Model.

Seo Hyun Oh, Min Kang, Youngho Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using automated methods to detect safety problems with health information technology: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seo Hyun OhDepartment of IT Convergence Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea.
Min KangDepartment of IT Convergence Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea.
Youngho LeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion IITP-2021-2017-0-01630Ministry of Science and ICT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDe-identifying protected health information (PHI) in medical documents is important, and a prerequisite to deidentification is the identification of PHI entity names in clinical documents. This study aimed to compare the performance of three pre-training models that have recently attracted significant attention and to determine which model is more suitable for PHI recognition.

methodsWe compared the PHI recognition performance of deep learning models using the i2b2 2014 dataset. We used the three pre-training models-namely, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), robustly optimized BERT pre-training approach (RoBERTa), and XLNet (model built based on Transformer-XL)-to detect PHI. After the dataset was tokenized, it was processed using an inside-outside-beginning tagging scheme and WordPiecetokenized to place it into these models. Further, the PHI recognition performance was investigated using BERT, RoBERTa, and XLNet.

resultsComparing the PHI recognition performance of the three models, it was confirmed that XLNet had a superior F1-score of 96.29%. In addition, when checking PHI entity performance evaluation, RoBERTa and XLNet showed a 30% improvement in performance compared to BERT.

conclusionsAmong the pre-training models used in this study, XLNet exhibited superior performance because word embedding was well constructed using the two-stream self-attention method. In addition, compared to BERT, RoBERTa and XLNet showed superior performance, indicating that they were more effective in grasping the context.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBig DataData AnonymizationDeep LearningMedical Informatics

Identifiers

PMID35172087
PMCPMC8850174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.