Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171739›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2022

Differential attainment at MRCS according to gender, ethnicity, age and socioeconomic factors: a retrospective cohort study.

Ricky Ellis, Peter A Brennan, Amanda J Lee, Duncan Sg Scrimgeour, Jennifer Cleland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Performance of large language models at the MRCS Part A: a tool for medical education?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Medical stereotypes that must be shaken and stirred.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricky EllisInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7310-6904
Peter A BrennanDepartment of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK.
Amanda J LeeMedical Statistics Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK.
Duncan Sg ScrimgeourInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK.
Jennifer ClelandLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 308232, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA recent independent review on diversity and inclusivity highlighted concerns that barriers to surgical career progression exist for some groups of individuals and not others. Group-level differences in performance at the Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons (MRCS) examinations have been identified but are yet to be investigated. We aimed to characterise the relationship between sociodemographic differences and performance at MRCS.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingSecondary care.

participantsAll UK MRCS candidates attempting Part A (

main outcome measuresChi-square tests established univariate associations with MRCS performance. Multiple logistic regression identified independent predictors of success, adjusted for medical school performance.

resultsStatistically significant differences in MRCS pass rates were found according to gender, ethnicity, age, graduate status, educational background and socioeconomic status (all

conclusionsThere is significant group-level differential attainment at MRCS, likely to represent the accumulation of privilege and disadvantage experienced by individuals throughout their education and training. Those leading surgical education now have a responsibility to identify and address the causes of these attainment differences.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementSurgeonsClinical CompetenceEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsUnited KingdomClinicalmedical educationnon-clinicalpostgraduatesurgery

Identifiers

PMID35171739
PMCPMC9234885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.