Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171718›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022

Biphasic split-bolus injection protocol for routine contrast-enhanced chest CT: comparison with conventional early-phase single bolus technique.

Melahat Kul, Diğdem Kuru Öz, Ayşegül Gürsoy Coruh, Funda Özalp Ateş, Başak Gülpınar, Çağlar Uzun, K Çetin Atasoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melahat KulDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Diğdem Kuru ÖzDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ayşegül Gürsoy CoruhDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Funda Özalp AteşDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.
Başak GülpınarDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Çağlar UzunDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
K Çetin AtasoyDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Koç University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo present a routine contrast-enhanced chest CT protocol with a split-bolus injection technique achieving combined early- and delayed phase images with a single aquisition, and to compare this technique with a conventional early-phase single-bolus chest CT protocol we formerly used at our institution, in terms of attenuation of great thoracic vessels, pleura, included hepatic and portal venous enhancement, contrast-related artifacts, and image quality.

methodsA total of 202 patients, who underwent routine contrast-enhanced chest CT examination aquired with either conventional early-phase single-bolus technique (group A,

resultsWhile enhancement of thoracic vessels and normalised MPA enhancement did not differ significantly between both groups (

conclusionOur split-bolus chest CT injection protocol enables simultaneous enhancement for both vascular structures and soft tissues, and thus, might raise diagnostic confidence without the need of multiple acquisitions. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We think that this CT protocol might also be a promising alternative in lung cancer staging, where combined contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and abdomen is indicated. We therefore suggest to further evaluate its diagnostic utility in this setting, in particular in comparison with a late delayed chest-upper abdominal CT imaging protocol.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtifactsHumansRetrospective StudiesThoraxContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID35171718
PMCPMC10996411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.