Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171517›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2022

Characteristics of serum neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in hereditary spastic paraplegia type 4.

Christoph Kessler, Lina Maria Serna-Higuita, Carlo Wilke, Tim W Rattay, Holger Hengel, Jennifer Reichbauer, Elke Stransky, Alejandra Leyva-Gutiérrez, David Mengel, Matthis Synofzik and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain Is Elevated in Adaptor Protein Complex 4-Related Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph KesslerDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6211-903X
Lina Maria Serna-HiguitaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biostatistics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Carlo WilkeDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7250-8597
Tim W RattayDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5456-7761
Holger HengelDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Jennifer ReichbauerDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Elke StranskyCenter of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Alejandra Leyva-GutiérrezDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
David MengelDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4133-7182
Matthis SynofzikDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2280-7273
Ludger SchölsDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter MartusDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biostatistics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Rebecca SchüleDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Uncovering new genes and disease modifiers for ALS and related disordersU54NS092091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Michael Benatar · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
GENOME STUDIES IN HEREDITARY SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA - beyond the exomeR01NS072248 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Stephan Zuchner · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072248NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS092091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhile the anticipated rise of disease-modifying therapies calls for reliable trial outcome parameters, fluid biomarkers are lacking in spastic paraplegia type 4 (SPG4), the most prevalent form of hereditary spastic paraplegia. We therefore investigated serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) as a potential therapy response, diagnostic, monitoring, and prognostic biomarker in SPG4.

methodsWe assessed sNfL levels in 93 patients with SPG4 and 60 healthy controls. The longitudinal study of sNfL levels in SPG4 patients covered a baseline, 1-year follow-up and 2-year follow-up visit.

resultsLevels of sNfL were significantly increased in patients with genetically confirmed SPG4 compared to healthy controls matched in age and sex (p = 0.013, r = 0.2). Our cross-sectional analysis revealed a greater difference in sNfL levels between patients and controls in younger ages with decreasing fold change of patient sNfL elevation at older ages. Over our observational period of 2 years, sNfL levels remained stable in SPG4 patients. Disease severity and progression did not correlate with sNfL levels.

interpretationOur longitudinal data indicate a stable turnover of sNfL in manifest SPG4; therefore, sNfL levels are not suitable to monitor disease progression in SPG4. However, sNfL may be valuable as a therapy response biomarker, since its turnover could be modified by interventions. As the course of sNfL levels appears to be most dynamic around the onset of SPG4, the ability to detect a therapy response appears to be especially promising in younger patients, matching the need to initiate treatment in early disease stages.

Indexed as

Spastic Paraplegia, HereditaryBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntermediate FilamentsLongitudinal StudiesParaplegiaBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35171517
PMCPMC8935322
OpenAlexW4213007017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.