Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171488›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Identification of RNA-RBP Interactions in Subcellular Compartments by CLIP-Seq.

Sonu Sahadevan, Manuela Pérez-Berlanga, Magdalini Polymenidou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonu Sahadevan *Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Manuela Pérez-Berlanga *Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Magdalini PolymenidouDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. magdalini.polymenidou@uzh.ch.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-linking immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing (CLIP-seq) allows the identification of RNA targets bound by a specific RNA-binding protein (RBP) in in vivo and ex vivo experimental models with high specificity. Due to the little RNA yield obtained after cross-linking, immunoprecipitation, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, membrane transfer, and RNA extraction, CLIP-seq is usually performed from relatively large amounts of starting material, like cell lysates or tissue homogenates. However, RBP binding of its specific RNA targets depends on its subcellular localization, and a different set of RNAs may be bound by the same RBP within distinct subcellular sites. To uncover these RNA subsets, preparation of CLIP-seq libraries from specific subcellular compartments and comparison to CLIP-seq datasets from total lysates is necessary, yet there are currently no available protocols for this. Here we describe the adaptation of CLIP-seq to identify the specific RNA targets of an RBP (FUS) at a small subcompartment, that is, neuronal synapses, including subcompartment isolation, RBP-RNA complex enrichment, and upscaling steps.

Indexed as

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingRNABinding SitesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingImmunoprecipitationSequence Analysis, RNARNACLIP-seqCross-linking immunoprecipitationHigh throughput sequencingImmunoprecipitationProtein–RNA interactionsRNARNA-binding proteins

Identifiers

PMID35171488
OpenAlexW4213352968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.