Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171384›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular drugs and therapy2022

Do We Really Need Aspirin Loading for STEMI?

Regina Ye, Hani Jneid, Mahboob Alam, Barry F Uretsky, Dan Atar, Masafumi Kitakaze, Sean M Davidson, Derek M Yellon, Yochai Birnbaum

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Do We Still Need Aspirin in Coronary Artery Disease?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Regina YeUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Hani JneidDepartment of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge Street Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.
Mahboob AlamDepartment of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge Street Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.
Barry F UretskyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Central Arkansas Veterans Health System, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Dan AtarDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval, Oslo, Norway, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Masafumi KitakazeCenter of Medical Innovation and Translational Research, Department of Medical Data Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Sean M DavidsonThe Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, 67 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, UK.
Derek M YellonThe Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, 67 Chenies Mews, London, WC1E 6HX, UK.
Yochai BirnbaumDepartment of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge Street Houston, Texas, 77030, USA. ybirnbau@bcm.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7653-6328
Baylor College of Medicine · USUniversity College London · GBCentral Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · USOslo University Hospital · NOThe University of Osaka · JPThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aspirin loading (chewable or intravenous) as soon as possible after presentation is a class I recommendation by current ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guidelines. Earlier achievement of therapeutic antiplatelet effects by aspirin loading has long been considered the standard of care. However, the effects of the loading dose of aspirin (alone or in addition to a chronic maintenance oral dose) have not been studied. A large proportion of myocardial cell death occurs upon and after reperfusion (reperfusion injury). Numerous agents and interventions have been shown to limit infarct size in animal models when administered before or immediately after reperfusion. However, these interventions have predominantly failed to show significant protection in clinical studies. In the current review, we raise the hypothesis that aspirin loading may be the culprit. Data obtained from animal models consistently show that statins, ticagrelor, opiates, and ischemic postconditioning limit myocardial infarct size. In most of these studies, aspirin was not administered. However, when aspirin was administered before reperfusion (as is the case in the majority of studies enrolling STEMI patients), the protective effects of statin, ticagrelor, morphine, and ischemic postconditioning were attenuated, which can be plausibly attributable to aspirin loading. We therefore suggest studying the effects of aspirin loading before reperfusion on the infarct size limiting effects of statins, ticagrelor, morphine, and/ or postconditioning in large animal models using long reperfusion periods (at least 24 h). If indeed aspirin attenuates the protective effects, clinical trials should be conducted comparing aspirin loading to alternative antiplatelet regimens without aspirin loading in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Indexed as

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionAnimalsAspirinMorphine DerivativesTicagrelorTreatment OutcomeAspirinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMorphine DerivativesTicagrelorAnimal modelsAspirinHumansInfarct sizePostconditioningReperfusion injuryStatinsSTEMI

Identifiers

PMID35171384
OpenAlexW4213318458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.