Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171345›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2022

A Bayesian Modelling Framework for Integration of Ecosystem Services into Freshwater Resources Management.

Michael Bruen, Thibault Hallouin, Michael Christie, Ronan Matson, Ewa Siwicka, Fiona Kelly, Craig Bullock, Hugh B Feeley, Edel Hannigan, Mary Kelly-Quinn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael BruenUniversity College Dublin, CWRR, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. michael.bruen@ucd.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-5614-9432
Thibault HallouinUniversity College Dublin, CWRR, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Michael ChristieAberystwyth University, Business School, Aberystwyth, UK.
Ronan MatsonInland Fisheries Ireland, 3044 Lake Drive, Citywest Business Campus, Dublin, Ireland.
Ewa SiwickaUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Fiona KellyInland Fisheries Ireland, 3044 Lake Drive, Citywest Business Campus, Dublin, Ireland.
Craig BullockUniversity College Dublin, APEP, Richview, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Hugh B FeeleyUniversity College Dublin, SBES, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Edel HanniganUniversity College Dublin, SBES, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Mary Kelly-QuinnUniversity College Dublin, SBES, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of ecological response to multiple stressors and of the consequences for ecosystem services (ES) delivery are scarce. This paper describes a methodology for constructing a BBN combining catchment and water quality model output, data, and expert knowledge that can support the integration of ES into water resources management. It proposes "small group" workshop methods for elucidating expert knowledge and analyses the areas of agreement and disagreement between experts. The model was developed for four selected ES and for assessing the consequences of management options relating to no-change, riparian management, and decreasing or increasing livestock numbers. Compared with no-change, riparian management and a decrease in livestock numbers improved the ES investigated to varying degrees. Sensitivity analysis of the expert information in the BBN showed the greatest disagreements between experts were mainly for low probability situations and thus had little impact on the results. Conversely, in our applications, the best agreement between experts tended to occur for the higher probability, more likely, situations. This has implications for the practical use of this type of model to support catchment management decisions. The complexity of the relationship between management measures, the water quality and ecological responses and resulting changes in ES must not be a barrier to making decisions in the present time. The interactions of multiple stressors further complicate the situation. However, management decisions typically relate to the overall character of solutions and not their detailed design, which can follow once the nature of the solution has been chosen, for example livestock management or riparian measures or both.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAnimalsBayes TheoremFresh WaterLivestockWater ResourcesAnglingBayesian belief networkEcosystem servicesExpert knowledgeFreshwaterMulti-stressorsSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID35171345
PMCPMC9012763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.