Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171343›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2022

Prosomeric classification of retinorecipient centers: a new causal scenario.

Luis Puelles

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Midbrain Preisthmus: A Poorly Known Effect of the Isthmic Organizer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Luis PuellesDepartment Human Anatomy, University of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca Institute for Biomedical Research, 30120, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain. puelles@um.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9541-7073

Funding

Fundación Séneca 19904/GERM/15/5672 F.Séneca
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retina is known to target many superficial areas in the brain. These have always been studied under the tenets of the classic columnar brain model, which was not designed to produce causal explanations, being functionally oriented. This has led over the years to a remarkable absence of understanding or even hypothetical thinking about why the optic tract takes its precise course, why there are so many retinal targets (some of them at surprising sites), what mechanism places each one of them exactly at its standard position, which processes specify spatial aspects of retinotopy and differential physiological properties within the visual system, and so on, including questions about conserved and changing evolutionary aspects of the visual structures. The author posits that the origin of the current causally uninformative state of the field is the columnar model, which worked as a subliminal or cryptic dogma that disregards the molecular developmental advances accruing during the last 40 years, and in general distracts the attention of neuroscientists from causal approaches. There is now an alternative brain model, known as the prosomeric model, that does not have these problems. The author aims to show that once the data on retinal projections are mapped and analyzed within the prosomeric model the scenario changes drastically and multiple opportunities for formulating hypotheses for causal explanation of any aspects about the visual projections become apparent (emphasis is made on mouse and rabbit data, but any set of data on retinal projections in vertebrates can be used, as shown in some examples).

Indexed as

BrainRetinaAnimalsBrain MappingMiceRabbitsVertebratesVisual PathwaysBrain AP axisBrain DV dimensionDiencephalic prosomeresForebrainHypothalamic prosomeresMidbrain prosomeresProsomeric modelRetinotopyVertebratesVisual centres

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.