ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022
[Quality management and development in primary prevention and health promotion: status, challenges, and perspectives].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of health promotion in daycare centers and elementary schools based on four selected projects].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Article
- [Evidence-based prevention for child and adolescent mental health: the "Communities That Care" (CTC) approach for Germany].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past three decades, quality development in primary prevention and health promotion have developed significantly. A major contribution to this has been their legal anchoring. The reintroduction of prevention and health promotion in the statutory health insurance and the Prevention Act gave this development an additional boost. The discourse that had already begun in the run-up to this, involving numerous researchers and stakeholders from different fields of prevention and health promotion, contributed to an increased understanding of central aspects of quality development. Comprehensive procedures for quality assurance and development are available for prevention and health promotion. In addition, recommendations for action, checklists, and instruments, for example, have been edited and are easily accessible for all four quality dimensions - planning, structural, process, and outcome quality. Certifications and quality seals for interventions and health promoting institutions are available.However, none of these procedures is used comprehensively and continuously. The fields in prevention and health promotion differ significantly with regard to the implementation of quality assurance. Obstacles are, among other things, insufficient human and financial resources with simultaneous discontinuity and intra-facility quality management systems. There is a need for action to further develop the implementation of quality on site, especially in the community setting, and to better integrate quality assurance into existing structures. Qualification, intensive exchange, and small-scale prevention reporting should promote quality development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.