Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171319›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022

[Quality management and development in primary prevention and health promotion: status, challenges, and perspectives].

Ulla Walter

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ulla WalterInstitut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. walter.ulla@mh-hannover.de.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past three decades, quality development in primary prevention and health promotion have developed significantly. A major contribution to this has been their legal anchoring. The reintroduction of prevention and health promotion in the statutory health insurance and the Prevention Act gave this development an additional boost. The discourse that had already begun in the run-up to this, involving numerous researchers and stakeholders from different fields of prevention and health promotion, contributed to an increased understanding of central aspects of quality development. Comprehensive procedures for quality assurance and development are available for prevention and health promotion. In addition, recommendations for action, checklists, and instruments, for example, have been edited and are easily accessible for all four quality dimensions - planning, structural, process, and outcome quality. Certifications and quality seals for interventions and health promoting institutions are available.However, none of these procedures is used comprehensively and continuously. The fields in prevention and health promotion differ significantly with regard to the implementation of quality assurance. Obstacles are, among other things, insufficient human and financial resources with simultaneous discontinuity and intra-facility quality management systems. There is a need for action to further develop the implementation of quality on site, especially in the community setting, and to better integrate quality assurance into existing structures. Qualification, intensive exchange, and small-scale prevention reporting should promote quality development.

Indexed as

Health PromotionNational Health ProgramsGermanyHumansPrimary PreventionCertificationConcept qualityPrevention ActQuality developmentQuality instruments

Identifiers

PMID35171319
PMCPMC8888369
OpenAlexW4213023160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.