Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171290›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

Phylodynamic Inference of Bacterial Outbreak Parameters Using Nanopore Sequencing.

Eike Steinig, Sebastián Duchêne, Izzard Aglua, Andrew Greenhill, Rebecca Ford, Mition Yoannes, Jan Jaworski, Jimmy Drekore, Bohu Urakoko, Harry Poka and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nanopore Sequencing for Chikungunya Virus: Principles and Application.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mobile and Self-Sustained Data Storage in an Extremophile Genomic DNA.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Eike SteinigDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5399-5353
Sebastián DuchêneDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.
Izzard AgluaJoseph Nombri Memorial-Kundiawa General Hospital, Kundiawa, Papua New Guinea.
Andrew GreenhillPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua, Papua New Guinea.
Rebecca FordPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua, Papua New Guinea.
Mition YoannesPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua, Papua New Guinea.
Jan JaworskiJoseph Nombri Memorial-Kundiawa General Hospital, Kundiawa, Papua New Guinea.
Jimmy DrekoreSimbu Children's Foundation, Kundiawa, Papua New Guinea.
Bohu UrakokoJoseph Nombri Memorial-Kundiawa General Hospital, Kundiawa, Papua New Guinea.
Harry PokaJoseph Nombri Memorial-Kundiawa General Hospital, Kundiawa, Papua New Guinea.
Clive WurrSurgical Department, Goroka General Hospital, Goroka, Papua New Guinea.
Eri EbosSurgical Department, Goroka General Hospital, Goroka, Papua New Guinea.
David NangenSurgical Department, Goroka General Hospital, Goroka, Papua New Guinea.
Laurens ManningDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4334-5351
Moses LamanPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua, Papua New Guinea.
Cadhla FirthAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville and Cairns, Australia.
Simon SmithCairns Hospital and Hinterland Health Service, Queensland Health, Cairns, Australia.
William PomatPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua, Papua New Guinea.
Steven Y C TongDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.
Lachlan CoinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.
Emma McBrydeAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville and Cairns, Australia.
Paul HorwoodPapua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua, Papua New Guinea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopore sequencing and phylodynamic modeling have been used to reconstruct the transmission dynamics of viral epidemics, but their application to bacterial pathogens has remained challenging. Cost-effective bacterial genome sequencing and variant calling on nanopore platforms would greatly enhance surveillance and outbreak response in communities without access to sequencing infrastructure. Here, we adapt random forest models for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) polishing developed by Sanderson and colleagues (2020. High precision Neisseria gonorrhoeae variant and antimicrobial resistance calling from metagenomic nanopore sequencing. Genome Res. 30(9):1354-1363) to estimate divergence and effective reproduction numbers (Re) of two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreaks from remote communities in Far North Queensland and Papua New Guinea (PNG; n = 159). Successive barcoded panels of S. aureus isolates (2 × 12 per MinION) sequenced at low coverage (>5× to 10×) provided sufficient data to accurately infer genotypes with high recall when compared with Illumina references. Random forest models achieved high resolution on ST93 outbreak sequence types (>90% accuracy and precision) and enabled phylodynamic inference of epidemiological parameters using birth-death skyline models. Our method reproduced phylogenetic topology, origin of the outbreaks, and indications of epidemic growth (Re > 1). Nextflow pipelines implement SNP polisher training, evaluation, and outbreak alignments, enabling reconstruction of within-lineage transmission dynamics for infection control of bacterial disease outbreaks on portable nanopore platforms. Our study shows that nanopore technology can be used for bacterial outbreak reconstruction at competitive costs, providing opportunities for infection control in hospitals and communities without access to sequencing infrastructure, such as in remote northern Australia and PNG.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNanopore SequencingBacteriaDisease OutbreaksGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenyStaphylococcus aureusbacteriaBEASTnanoporeoutbreaksphylodynamicsreproduction number

Identifiers

PMID35171290
PMCPMC8963328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.