Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171258›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Use With HIV Incidence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Hongyi Wang, Zixin Wang, Xiaojie Huang, Yaokai Chen, Hui Wang, Sitong Cui, Jing Zhang, Zhenxing Chu, Qinghai Hu, Haibo Ding and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Canadian guideline on HIV pre- and postexposure prophylaxis: 2025 update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Hongyi WangNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Zixin WangJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xiaojie HuangCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yaokai ChenChongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases, Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen (Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China.
Sitong CuiNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Jing ZhangNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Zhenxing ChuNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Qinghai HuNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Haibo DingNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Hanzhu QianSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Huachun ZouSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Weiming TangUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Project-China, Guangzhou, China.
Yangyang GaoNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Xia JinNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Zhaozhen LiuNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Lukun ZhangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases, Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen (Second Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China.
Jin ZhaoShenzhen Center for Disease Control and Prevention Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoqing HeChongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Yongjun JiangNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Wenqing GengNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Junjie XuNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
Hong ShangNHC Key Laboratory of AIDS Immunology (China Medical University), National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang.
China Real-World Oral Intake of PrEP (CROPrEP) Study Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Evidence on HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM) is critical to guide its large-scale implementation in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To evaluate incident HIV infection, adherence, safety, and changes in sexual behaviors among MSM using daily PrEP (D-PrEP) and event-driven PrEP (ED-PrEP) in 4 cities in China. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted among HIV-seronegative MSM from December 11, 2018, to November 30, 2020, in Beijing, Shenyang, Chongqing, and Shenzhen. Participants self-chose D-PrEP or ED-PrEP regimens at baseline and could switch regimens during the 12-month study period. HIV-negative MSM who declined to initiate PrEP (nonusers) in the same cities joined a separate parallel prospective cohort and served as control individuals. Interventions: PrEP consisted of coformulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 300 mg, and emtricitabine, 200 mg. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was incident HIV infection. Poisson regression was used to obtain the HIV incidence rate ratio (IRR). Results: A total of 1530 MSM were included in the analysis (median age, 30 [IQR, 25-37] years). At baseline, 520 MSM chose D-PrEP (median age, 29 [IQR, 25-35] years) and 503 chose ED-PrEP (median age, 29 [IQR, 25-36] years). The median HIV Risk Index score was 18 (IQR, 12-22) among D-PrEP users and 18 (IQR, 11-22) among ED-PrEP users. Among 507 PrEP nonusers, the median age was 33 (IQR, 27-43) years, and the median HIV Risk Index score was 12 (IQR, 7-18). Although PrEP users had more baseline behaviors associated with HIV risk, the HIV incidence was lower among all PrEP users (adjusted IRR, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.04-0.21]), ED-PrEP users (adjusted IRR, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01-0.22]), and D-PrEP users (adjusted IRR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.04-0.33]) compared with PrEP nonusers. There was no difference in HIV incidence between D-PrEP users and ED-PrEP users (IRR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.06-2.04]). Event-driven PrEP users consumed 40% fewer tablets than D-PrEP users during the study period. Adherence, defined as the proportion of self-reported days with sexual intercourse in which PrEP was taken according to prescription of at least 90%, increased over time among ED-PrEP users (from 57.4% to 77.8%; P < .001 for trend) and decreased over time among D-PrEP users (from 75.1% to 72.1%; P = .02 for trend). Daily PrEP users reported fewer adverse events than ED-PrEP users (193 of 520 [37.1%] vs 241 of 503 [47.9%]). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that D-PrEP and ED-PrEP regimens are associated with lower incidence of HIV and a good safety profile among high-risk MSM in China. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number: ChiCTR-IIN-17013762.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-HIV AgentsAsian PeopleChinaCohort StudiesEfavirenz, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug CombinationHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansIncidenceMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisProspective StudiesAnti-HIV AgentsEfavirenz, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID35171258
PMCPMC8851305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.