ArticleSoft matter2022
Probing the dynamics of turbid colloidal suspensions using differential dynamic microscopy.
Article in Soft matter, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Particle sizing in milk by combined differential dynamic microscopy and cryo-FIB-SEM tomography.Soft matter · 2026Article
- Multiscale stress dynamics in sheared liquid foams revealed by tomo-rheoscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Sizing multimodal suspensions with differential dynamic microscopy.Soft matter · 2023Article
- Quantifying Cytoskeleton Dynamics Using Differential Dynamic Microscopy.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few techniques can reliably measure the dynamics of colloidal suspensions or other soft materials over a wide range of turbidities. Here we systematically investigate the capability of Differential Dynamic Microscopy (DDM) to characterise particle dynamics in turbid colloidal suspensions based on brightfield optical microscopy. We measure the Intermediate Scattering Function (ISF) of polystyrene microspheres suspended in water over a range of concentrations, turbidities, and up to 4 orders of magnitude in time-scales. These DDM results are compared to data obtained from both Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Two-colour Dynamic Light Scattering (TCDLS). The latter allows for suppression of multiple scattering for moderately turbid suspensions. We find that DDM can obtain reliable diffusion coefficients at up to 10 and 1000 times higher particle concentrations than TCDLS and standard DLS, respectively. Additionally, we investigate the roles of the four length-scales relevant when imaging a suspension: the sample thickness
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.