Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35171009›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

A Bacterial Genome and Culture Collection of Gut Microbial in Weanling Piglet.

Bo Dong, Xiaoqian Lin, Xiaohuan Jing, Tongyuan Hu, Jianwei Zhou, Jianwei Chen, Liang Xiao, Bo Wang, Zhuang Chen, Jing Liu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High-throughput single-cell isolation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Investigating the modulatory effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bo Dong *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Resources Preservation and Utilization, Agro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6965-4585
Xiaoqian Lin *Qingdao-Europe Advanced Institute for Life Sciences, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China.
Xiaohuan Jing *China National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Tongyuan Hu *BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jianwei ZhouQingdao-Europe Advanced Institute for Life Sciences, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China.
Jianwei ChenQingdao-Europe Advanced Institute for Life Sciences, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China.
Liang XiaoQingdao-Europe Advanced Institute for Life Sciences, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China.
Bo WangChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Zhuang ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Resources Preservation and Utilization, Agro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Jing LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Resources Preservation and Utilization, Agro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yiyin HuChina National Genebank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Guilin LiuBGI-Qingdao, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China.
Shanshan LiuQingdao-Europe Advanced Institute for Life Sciences, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China.
Junnian LiuQingdao-Europe Advanced Institute for Life Sciences, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China.
Wenkang WeiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Resources Preservation and Utilization, Agro-biological Gene Research Center, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanqiang ZouQingdao-Europe Advanced Institute for Life Sciences, BGI-Shenzhen, Qingdao, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2380-264X
BGI Group (China) · CNKey Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CNChina National GeneBank · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Wellcome Trust 201918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiota hosted in the pig gastrointestinal tract are important to health of this biomedical model. However, the individual species and functional repertoires that make up the pig gut microbiome remain largely undefined. Here we comprehensively investigated the genomes and functions of the piglet gut microbiome using culture-based and metagenomics approaches. A collection included 266 cultured genomes and 482 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) that were clustered to 428 species across 10 phyla was established. Among these clustered species, 333 genomes represent potential new species. Less matches between cultured genomes and MAGs revealed a substantial bias for the acquisition of reference genomes by the two strategies. Glycoside hydrolases was the dominant category of carbohydrate-active enzymes. Four-hundred forty-five secondary metabolite biosynthetic genes were predicted from 292 genomes with bacteriocin being the most. Pan genome analysis of

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenome, BacterialAnimalsBacteriaFecesFemaleMaleMetagenomicsPhylogenySwinefunctional repertoiresgenome collectionlimosilactobacillus reuterimetagenome-assembled genomesweanling piglet

Identifiers

PMID35171009
PMCPMC8849097
OpenAlexW4220964317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.